From: Alexander Shishkin Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 13:23:52 +0000 (+0300) Subject: perf/x86/intel/bts: Fix BTS PMI detection X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4d4c474124649198d9b0a065c06f9362cf18e14e;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git perf/x86/intel/bts: Fix BTS PMI detection Since BTS doesn't have a dedicated PMI status bit, the driver needs to take extra care to check for the condition that triggers it to avoid spurious NMI warnings. Regardless of the local BTS context state, the only way of knowing that the NMI is ours is to compare the write pointer against the interrupt threshold. Reported-by: Vince Weaver Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: vince@deater.net Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160906132353.19887-5-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c index 61e1d713b114..9233edf993e1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c @@ -446,26 +446,37 @@ bts_buffer_reset(struct bts_buffer *buf, struct perf_output_handle *handle) int intel_bts_interrupt(void) { + struct debug_store *ds = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events)->ds; struct bts_ctx *bts = this_cpu_ptr(&bts_ctx); struct perf_event *event = bts->handle.event; struct bts_buffer *buf; s64 old_head; - int err = -ENOSPC; + int err = -ENOSPC, handled = 0; + + /* + * The only surefire way of knowing if this NMI is ours is by checking + * the write ptr against the PMI threshold. + */ + if (ds->bts_index >= ds->bts_interrupt_threshold) + handled = 1; /* * this is wrapped in intel_bts_enable_local/intel_bts_disable_local, * so we can only be INACTIVE or STOPPED */ if (READ_ONCE(bts->state) == BTS_STATE_STOPPED) - return 0; + return handled; buf = perf_get_aux(&bts->handle); + if (!buf) + return handled; + /* * Skip snapshot counters: they don't use the interrupt, but * there's no other way of telling, because the pointer will * keep moving */ - if (!buf || buf->snapshot) + if (buf->snapshot) return 0; old_head = local_read(&buf->head); @@ -473,7 +484,7 @@ int intel_bts_interrupt(void) /* no new data */ if (old_head == local_read(&buf->head)) - return 0; + return handled; perf_aux_output_end(&bts->handle, local_xchg(&buf->data_size, 0), !!local_xchg(&buf->lost, 0));