From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 22:55:22 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c: fix error caused by shifted mask
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4b949b8af12e24b8a48fa5bb775a13b558d9f4da;p=GitHub%2Fexynos8895%2Fandroid_kernel_samsung_universal8895.git
drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c: fix error caused by shifted mask
During the development of this driver an in-house register documentation
was used. The last week some integration tests were done and this
problem was found. It turned out that the released register
documentation is wrong.
The fix is very simple: shift all masks by one.
Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>
Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
index ee14662ed5ce..98cae529373f 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
@@ -47,37 +47,37 @@ static struct ot200_led leds[] = {
{
.name = "led_1",
.port = 0x49,
- .mask = BIT(7),
+ .mask = BIT(6),
},
{
.name = "led_2",
.port = 0x49,
- .mask = BIT(6),
+ .mask = BIT(5),
},
{
.name = "led_3",
.port = 0x49,
- .mask = BIT(5),
+ .mask = BIT(4),
},
{
.name = "led_4",
.port = 0x49,
- .mask = BIT(4),
+ .mask = BIT(3),
},
{
.name = "led_5",
.port = 0x49,
- .mask = BIT(3),
+ .mask = BIT(2),
},
{
.name = "led_6",
.port = 0x49,
- .mask = BIT(2),
+ .mask = BIT(1),
},
{
.name = "led_7",
.port = 0x49,
- .mask = BIT(1),
+ .mask = BIT(0),
}
};