From: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 04:14:33 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: binder: fix UAF when releasing todo list
X-Git-Tag: MMI-QSAS30.62-24-14^0
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4b05bd5ca8c161d6909d84d1f7fe2deedc82a60f;p=GitHub%2FMotorolaMobilityLLC%2Fkernel-slsi.git

binder: fix UAF when releasing todo list

When releasing a thread todo list when tearing down
a binder_proc, the following race was possible which
could result in a use-after-free:

1.  Thread 1: enter binder_release_work from binder_thread_release
2.  Thread 2: binder_update_ref_for_handle() calls binder_dec_node_ilocked()
3.  Thread 2: dec nodeA --> 0 (will free node)
4.  Thread 1: ACQ inner_proc_lock
5.  Thread 2: block on inner_proc_lock
6.  Thread 1: dequeue work (BINDER_WORK_NODE, part of nodeA)
7.  Thread 1: REL inner_proc_lock
8.  Thread 2: ACQ inner_proc_lock
9.  Thread 2: todo list cleanup, but work was already dequeued
10. Thread 2: free node
11. Thread 2: REL inner_proc_lock
12. Thread 1: deref w->type (UAF)

The problem was that for a BINDER_WORK_NODE, the binder_work element
must not be accessed after releasing the inner_proc_lock while
processing the todo list elements since another thread might be
handling a deref on the node containing the binder_work element
leading to the node being freed.

Mot-CRs-fixed: (CR)
CVE-Fixed: CVE-2020-0423
Bug: 161151868

Signed-off-by: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Change-Id: I4ae752abfe1aa38872be6f266ddd271802952625
Signed-off-by: Jignesh Patel <jignesh@motorola.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.mot.com/1747882
SLTApproved: Slta Waiver
SME-Granted: SME Approvals Granted
Tested-by: Jira Key
Reviewed-by: Xiangpo Zhao <zhaoxp3@motorola.com>
Submit-Approved: Jira Key
(cherry picked from commit dd0333429049cf16ce07df311dfcd5495416f12d)
---

diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
index afa11e410d33..3b9b6e2f5e24 100644
--- a/drivers/android/binder.c
+++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ struct binder_device {
 struct binder_work {
 	struct list_head entry;
 
-	enum {
+	enum binder_work_type {
 		BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION = 1,
 		BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE,
 		BINDER_WORK_RETURN_ERROR,
@@ -1011,27 +1011,6 @@ static struct binder_work *binder_dequeue_work_head_ilocked(
 	return w;
 }
 
-/**
- * binder_dequeue_work_head() - Dequeues the item at head of list
- * @proc:         binder_proc associated with list
- * @list:         list to dequeue head
- *
- * Removes the head of the list if there are items on the list
- *
- * Return: pointer dequeued binder_work, NULL if list was empty
- */
-static struct binder_work *binder_dequeue_work_head(
-					struct binder_proc *proc,
-					struct list_head *list)
-{
-	struct binder_work *w;
-
-	binder_inner_proc_lock(proc);
-	w = binder_dequeue_work_head_ilocked(list);
-	binder_inner_proc_unlock(proc);
-	return w;
-}
-
 static void
 binder_defer_work(struct binder_proc *proc, enum binder_deferred_state defer);
 static void binder_free_thread(struct binder_thread *thread);
@@ -4551,13 +4530,17 @@ static void binder_release_work(struct binder_proc *proc,
 				struct list_head *list)
 {
 	struct binder_work *w;
+	enum binder_work_type wtype;
 
 	while (1) {
-		w = binder_dequeue_work_head(proc, list);
+		binder_inner_proc_lock(proc);
+		w = binder_dequeue_work_head_ilocked(list);
+		wtype = w ? w->type : 0;
+		binder_inner_proc_unlock(proc);
 		if (!w)
 			return;
 
-		switch (w->type) {
+		switch (wtype) {
 		case BINDER_WORK_TRANSACTION: {
 			struct binder_transaction *t;
 
@@ -4591,9 +4574,11 @@ static void binder_release_work(struct binder_proc *proc,
 			kfree(death);
 			binder_stats_deleted(BINDER_STAT_DEATH);
 		} break;
+		case BINDER_WORK_NODE:
+			break;
 		default:
 			pr_err("unexpected work type, %d, not freed\n",
-			       w->type);
+			       wtype);
 			break;
 		}
 	}