From: Xinming Hu Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:48:27 +0000 (+0530) Subject: mwifiex: fix command timeout problem seen in stress tests X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=49abe5c83cd066f34f308d8c9e8abff7c2fb5d64;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git mwifiex: fix command timeout problem seen in stress tests It is observed that if single tid 6 packet comes among with massive tid 0 packets, tid 6 packet may stay in it's queue and will never be transmited. This is because wmm.highest_queued_prio will be set to 2 during transmission of tid 0 packets As a result, main work thread keeps on looping without serving that packet. In this case, if command has downloaded to firmware, driver doesn't process it's response causing command timeout. This patch will reset highest_queued_prio if packets exist in data queue, and try to find a ra_list for current private. Signed-off-by: Xinming Hu Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo --- diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.h b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.h index 26df28f4bfb2..d61fe3a72118 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/main.h @@ -315,6 +315,7 @@ struct mwifiex_tid_tbl { #define WMM_HIGHEST_PRIORITY 7 #define HIGH_PRIO_TID 7 #define LOW_PRIO_TID 0 +#define NO_PKT_PRIO_TID -1 #define MWIFIEX_WMM_DRV_DELAY_MAX 510 struct mwifiex_wmm_desc { diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/wmm.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/wmm.c index 1ff3a87d5784..28c2f6fae3e6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/wmm.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/wmm.c @@ -1105,6 +1105,7 @@ mwifiex_wmm_get_highest_priolist_ptr(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter, &adapter->bss_prio_tbl[j].bss_prio_head, list) { +try_again: priv_tmp = adapter->bss_prio_tbl[j].bss_prio_cur->priv; if (((priv_tmp->bss_mode != NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC) && @@ -1140,8 +1141,18 @@ mwifiex_wmm_get_highest_priolist_ptr(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter, ra_list_spinlock, flags_ra); } - } + if (atomic_read(&priv_tmp->wmm.tx_pkts_queued) != 0) { + atomic_set(&priv_tmp->wmm.highest_queued_prio, + HIGH_PRIO_TID); + /* Iterate current private once more, since + * there still exist packets in data queue + */ + goto try_again; + } else + atomic_set(&priv_tmp->wmm.highest_queued_prio, + NO_PKT_PRIO_TID); + } } return NULL;