From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:02:43 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: drm/i915: Fix timeout with missed interrupts in __wait_seqno
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=47e9766df0298739aab87c9874a21feb71560953;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

drm/i915: Fix timeout with missed interrupts in __wait_seqno

Commit 094f9a54e355 ("drm/i915: Fix __wait_seqno to use true infinite
timeouts") added support for __wait_seqno to detect missing interrupts and
go around them by polling. As there is also timeout detection in
__wait_seqno, the polling and timeout detection were done with the same
timer.

When there has been missed interrupts and polling is needed, the timer is
set to trigger in (now + 1) jiffies in future, instead of the caller
specified timeout.

Now when io_schedule() returns, we calculate the jiffies left to timeout
using the timer expiration value. As the current jiffies is now bound to be
always equal or greater than the expiration value, the timeout_jiffies will
become zero or negative and we return -ETIME to caller even tho the
timeout was never reached.

Fix this by decoupling timeout calculation from timer expiration.

v2: Commit message with some sense in it (Chris Wilson)

v3: add parenthesis on timeout_expire calculation

v4: don't read jiffies without timeout (Chris Wilson)

Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index df83fec174e9..279387a2fef5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 seqno,
 	drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
 	struct timespec before, now;
 	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
-	long timeout_jiffies;
+	unsigned long timeout_expire;
 	int ret;
 
 	WARN(dev_priv->pc8.irqs_disabled, "IRQs disabled\n");
@@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 seqno,
 	if (i915_seqno_passed(ring->get_seqno(ring, true), seqno))
 		return 0;
 
-	timeout_jiffies = timeout ? timespec_to_jiffies_timeout(timeout) : 1;
+	timeout_expire = timeout ? jiffies + timespec_to_jiffies_timeout(timeout) : 0;
 
 	if (dev_priv->info->gen >= 6 && can_wait_boost(file_priv)) {
 		gen6_rps_boost(dev_priv);
@@ -1044,7 +1044,6 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 seqno,
 	getrawmonotonic(&before);
 	for (;;) {
 		struct timer_list timer;
-		unsigned long expire;
 
 		prepare_to_wait(&ring->irq_queue, &wait,
 				interruptible ? TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE : TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
@@ -1070,23 +1069,22 @@ static int __wait_seqno(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 seqno,
 			break;
 		}
 
-		if (timeout_jiffies <= 0) {
+		if (timeout && time_after_eq(jiffies, timeout_expire)) {
 			ret = -ETIME;
 			break;
 		}
 
 		timer.function = NULL;
 		if (timeout || missed_irq(dev_priv, ring)) {
+			unsigned long expire;
+
 			setup_timer_on_stack(&timer, fake_irq, (unsigned long)current);
-			expire = jiffies + (missed_irq(dev_priv, ring) ? 1: timeout_jiffies);
+			expire = missed_irq(dev_priv, ring) ? jiffies + 1 : timeout_expire;
 			mod_timer(&timer, expire);
 		}
 
 		io_schedule();
 
-		if (timeout)
-			timeout_jiffies = expire - jiffies;
-
 		if (timer.function) {
 			del_singleshot_timer_sync(&timer);
 			destroy_timer_on_stack(&timer);