From: Josh Poimboeuf Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 17:01:32 +0000 (-0500) Subject: objtool: Fix function fallthrough detection X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=47265dbd9f7ff8adbf48305676b6b35e759050b2;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git objtool: Fix function fallthrough detection commit e6f393bc939d566ce3def71232d8013de9aaadde upstream. When a function falls through to the next function due to a compiler bug, objtool prints some obscure warnings. For example: drivers/regulator/core.o: warning: objtool: regulator_count_voltages()+0x95: return with modified stack frame drivers/regulator/core.o: warning: objtool: regulator_count_voltages()+0x0: stack state mismatch: cfa1=7+32 cfa2=7+8 Instead it should be printing: drivers/regulator/core.o: warning: objtool: regulator_supply_is_couple() falls through to next function regulator_count_voltages() This used to work, but was broken by the following commit: 13810435b9a7 ("objtool: Support GCC 8's cold subfunctions") The padding nops at the end of a function aren't actually part of the function, as defined by the symbol table. So the 'func' variable in validate_branch() is getting cleared to NULL when a padding nop is encountered, breaking the fallthrough detection. If the current instruction doesn't have a function associated with it, just consider it to be part of the previously detected function by not overwriting the previous value of 'func'. Reported-by: kbuild test robot Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Fixes: 13810435b9a7 ("objtool: Support GCC 8's cold subfunctions") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/546d143820cd08a46624ae8440d093dd6c902cae.1557766718.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c index 3ff025b64527..ae3446768181 100644 --- a/tools/objtool/check.c +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c @@ -1779,7 +1779,8 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtool_file *file, struct instruction *first, return 1; } - func = insn->func ? insn->func->pfunc : NULL; + if (insn->func) + func = insn->func->pfunc; if (func && insn->ignore) { WARN_FUNC("BUG: why am I validating an ignored function?",