From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:47:34 +0000 (+0530)
Subject: spi: lm70llp: use dev_warn
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=46c52c28deb38df19b1284468792fb59e6a6c27b;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

spi: lm70llp: use dev_warn

As we have a struct device available it is better to use dev_warn()
instead of printk.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c b/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c
index ef829081abd7..cb2284475385 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c
@@ -249,9 +249,8 @@ static void spi_lm70llp_attach(struct parport *p)
 	 */
 	status = spi_bitbang_start(&pp->bitbang);
 	if (status < 0) {
-		printk(KERN_WARNING
-			"%s: spi_bitbang_start failed with status %d\n",
-			DRVNAME, status);
+		dev_warn(&pd->dev, "spi_bitbang_start failed with status %d\n",
+			 status);
 		goto out_off_and_release;
 	}
 
@@ -278,7 +277,7 @@ static void spi_lm70llp_attach(struct parport *p)
 		dev_dbg(&pp->spidev_lm70->dev, "spidev_lm70 at %s\n",
 			dev_name(&pp->spidev_lm70->dev));
 	else {
-		printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: spi_new_device failed\n", DRVNAME);
+		dev_warn(&pd->dev, "spi_new_device failed\n");
 		status = -ENODEV;
 		goto out_bitbang_stop;
 	}