From: will schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:59:33 +0000 (+1100)
Subject: [POWERPC] Fix switch_slb handling of 1T ESID values
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=465ccab9eb8209a2a402710b24a9bff127b25b94;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

[POWERPC] Fix switch_slb handling of 1T ESID values

Now that we have 1TB segment size support, we need to be using the
GET_ESID_1T macro when comparing ESID values for pc, stack, and
unmapped_base within switch_slb().   A new helper function called
esids_match() contains the logic for deciding when to call GET_ESID
and GET_ESID_1T.

This fixes a duplicate-slb-entry inspired machine-check exception I
was seeing when trying to run java on a power6 partition.

Tested on power6 and power5.

Signed-off-by: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
---

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c
index 637afb2386b7..27922dff8b94 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c
@@ -149,6 +149,35 @@ void slb_vmalloc_update(void)
 	slb_flush_and_rebolt();
 }
 
+/* Helper function to compare esids.  There are four cases to handle.
+ * 1. The system is not 1T segment size capable.  Use the GET_ESID compare.
+ * 2. The system is 1T capable, both addresses are < 1T, use the GET_ESID compare.
+ * 3. The system is 1T capable, only one of the two addresses is > 1T.  This is not a match.
+ * 4. The system is 1T capable, both addresses are > 1T, use the GET_ESID_1T macro to compare.
+ */
+static inline int esids_match(unsigned long addr1, unsigned long addr2)
+{
+	int esid_1t_count;
+
+	/* System is not 1T segment size capable. */
+	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT))
+		return (GET_ESID(addr1) == GET_ESID(addr2));
+
+	esid_1t_count = (((addr1 >> SID_SHIFT_1T) != 0) +
+				((addr2 >> SID_SHIFT_1T) != 0));
+
+	/* both addresses are < 1T */
+	if (esid_1t_count == 0)
+		return (GET_ESID(addr1) == GET_ESID(addr2));
+
+	/* One address < 1T, the other > 1T.  Not a match */
+	if (esid_1t_count == 1)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Both addresses are > 1T. */
+	return (GET_ESID_1T(addr1) == GET_ESID_1T(addr2));
+}
+
 /* Flush all user entries from the segment table of the current processor. */
 void switch_slb(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
@@ -194,15 +223,14 @@ void switch_slb(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
 		return;
 	slb_allocate(pc);
 
-	if (GET_ESID(pc) == GET_ESID(stack))
+	if (esids_match(pc,stack))
 		return;
 
 	if (is_kernel_addr(stack))
 		return;
 	slb_allocate(stack);
 
-	if ((GET_ESID(pc) == GET_ESID(unmapped_base))
-	    || (GET_ESID(stack) == GET_ESID(unmapped_base)))
+	if (esids_match(pc,unmapped_base) || esids_match(stack,unmapped_base))
 		return;
 
 	if (is_kernel_addr(unmapped_base))