From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 07:49:02 +0000 (+0900)
Subject: sched: Use task_rq_unlock() in __sched_setscheduler()
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=45afb1734fa6323a8ba08bd6c392ee227df67dde;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

sched: Use task_rq_unlock() in __sched_setscheduler()

It seems there's no specific reason to open-code it.  I guess
commit 0122ec5b02f76 ("sched: Add p->pi_lock to task_rq_lock()")
simply missed it.  Let's be consistent with others.

Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1341647342-6742-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 5d011ef4c0df..2cb4e7777998 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4340,9 +4340,7 @@ recheck:
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(policy == p->policy && (!rt_policy(policy) ||
 			param->sched_priority == p->rt_priority))) {
-
-		__task_rq_unlock(rq);
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
+		task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);
 		return 0;
 	}