From: Eric Anholt Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:55:00 +0000 (-0800) Subject: drm/i915: Work around gen7 BLT ring synchronization issues. X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=42ff6572e5a4a7414330a4ca91f0335da67deca9;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git drm/i915: Work around gen7 BLT ring synchronization issues. Previous to this commit, testing easily reproduced a failure where the seqno would apparently arrive after the IRQ associated with it, with test programs as simple as: for (;;) { glCopyPixels(0, 0, 1, 1); glFinish(); } Various workarounds we've seen for previous generations didn't work to fix this issue, so until new information comes in, replace the IRQ waits on the BLT ring with polling. Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt Tested-by: Eugeni Dodonov Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov Acked-by: Kenneth Graunke Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index f5dae5deca71..d0eb2280d8d9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -791,6 +791,17 @@ ring_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, return 0; } +static bool +gen7_blt_ring_get_irq(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) +{ + /* The BLT ring on IVB appears to have broken synchronization + * between the seqno write and the interrupt, so that the + * interrupt appears first. Returning false here makes + * i915_wait_request() do a polling loop, instead. + */ + return false; +} + static bool gen6_ring_get_irq(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, u32 gflag, u32 rflag) { @@ -1557,5 +1568,8 @@ int intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev) *ring = gen6_blt_ring; + if (IS_GEN7(dev)) + ring->irq_get = gen7_blt_ring_get_irq; + return intel_init_ring_buffer(dev, ring); }