From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 23:08:52 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: fm10k: split fm10k_reinit into two functions
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=40de1fad417cb7c6958c214ec1f4c8c29101cb7f;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

fm10k: split fm10k_reinit into two functions

There are several flows in the driver which perform the similar function
of tearing down software and restoring software to recover from certain
errors or PCIe events, including:

  * fm10k_reinit
  * fm10k_suspend/resume
  * fm10k_io_error_detected/fm10k_io_resume

In addition, we want to implement a .reset_notify() handler as well
which will also perform similar function.

Rework how the driver codes reset and resume flows by separating out the
reinit logic into two functions "fm10k_prepare_for_reset" and
"fm10k_handle_reset". This first step will allow us to re-use this
functionality in the similar blocks of code instead of re-coding the
same sequence of events slightly different.

The end result should be more maintainable and correct, fixing several
inconsistencies with the work flow.

The new functions expect to take the rtnl_lock() themselves, and it does
have the unfortunate side effect of having the reinit flow take then
release then take the rtnl_lock. However, this minor downside is
out weighted by the benefits of code reduction and reducing needless
difference between these flows.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Tested-by: Krishneil Singh <Krishneil.k.singh@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
---

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c
index 7c9b20c6b6c1..2963b41d01e2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_pci.c
@@ -136,11 +136,9 @@ static void fm10k_detach_subtask(struct fm10k_intfc *interface)
 	rtnl_unlock();
 }
 
-static void fm10k_reinit(struct fm10k_intfc *interface)
+static void fm10k_prepare_for_reset(struct fm10k_intfc *interface)
 {
 	struct net_device *netdev = interface->netdev;
-	struct fm10k_hw *hw = &interface->hw;
-	int err;
 
 	WARN_ON(in_interrupt());
 
@@ -165,6 +163,17 @@ static void fm10k_reinit(struct fm10k_intfc *interface)
 	/* delay any future reset requests */
 	interface->last_reset = jiffies + (10 * HZ);
 
+	rtnl_unlock();
+}
+
+static int fm10k_handle_reset(struct fm10k_intfc *interface)
+{
+	struct net_device *netdev = interface->netdev;
+	struct fm10k_hw *hw = &interface->hw;
+	int err;
+
+	rtnl_lock();
+
 	/* reset and initialize the hardware so it is in a known state */
 	err = hw->mac.ops.reset_hw(hw);
 	if (err) {
@@ -185,7 +194,7 @@ static void fm10k_reinit(struct fm10k_intfc *interface)
 		goto reinit_err;
 	}
 
-	/* reassociate interrupts */
+	/* re-associate interrupts */
 	err = fm10k_mbx_request_irq(interface);
 	if (err)
 		goto err_mbx_irq;
@@ -219,7 +228,7 @@ static void fm10k_reinit(struct fm10k_intfc *interface)
 
 	clear_bit(__FM10K_RESETTING, &interface->state);
 
-	return;
+	return err;
 err_open:
 	fm10k_mbx_free_irq(interface);
 err_mbx_irq:
@@ -230,6 +239,20 @@ reinit_err:
 	rtnl_unlock();
 
 	clear_bit(__FM10K_RESETTING, &interface->state);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static void fm10k_reinit(struct fm10k_intfc *interface)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	fm10k_prepare_for_reset(interface);
+
+	err = fm10k_handle_reset(interface);
+	if (err)
+		dev_err(&interface->pdev->dev,
+			"fm10k_handle_reset failed: %d\n", err);
 }
 
 static void fm10k_reset_subtask(struct fm10k_intfc *interface)