From: Frederic Weisbecker Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 02:37:27 +0000 (+0100) Subject: cgroup: Walk task list under tasklist_lock in cgroup_enable_task_cg_list X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3ce3230a0cff484e5130153f244d4fb8a56b3a8b;p=GitHub%2Fmt8127%2Fandroid_kernel_alcatel_ttab.git cgroup: Walk task list under tasklist_lock in cgroup_enable_task_cg_list Walking through the tasklist in cgroup_enable_task_cg_list() inside an RCU read side critical section is not enough because: - RCU is not (yet) safe against while_each_thread() - If we use only RCU, a forking task that has passed cgroup_post_fork() without seeing use_task_css_set_links == 1 is not guaranteed to have its child immediately visible in the tasklist if we walk through it remotely with RCU. In this case it will be missing in its css_set's task list. Thus we need to traverse the list (unfortunately) under the tasklist_lock. It makes us safe against while_each_thread() and also make sure we see all forked task that have been added to the tasklist. As a secondary effect, reading and writing use_task_css_set_links are now well ordered against tasklist traversing and modification. The new layout is: CPU 0 CPU 1 use_task_css_set_links = 1 write_lock(tasklist_lock) read_lock(tasklist_lock) add task to tasklist do_each_thread() { write_unlock(tasklist_lock) add thread to css set links if (use_task_css_set_links) } while_each_thread() add thread to css set links read_unlock(tasklist_lock) If CPU 0 traverse the list after the task has been added to the tasklist then it is correctly added to the css set links. OTOH if CPU 0 traverse the tasklist before the new task had the opportunity to be added to the tasklist because it was too early in the fork process, then CPU 1 catches up and add the task to the css set links after it added the task to the tasklist. The right value of use_task_css_set_links is guaranteed to be visible from CPU 1 due to the LOCK/UNLOCK implicit barrier properties: the read_unlock on CPU 0 makes the write on use_task_css_set_links happening and the write_lock on CPU 1 make the read of use_task_css_set_links that comes afterward to return the correct value. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Acked-by: Li Zefan Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Paul E. McKenney --- diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c index 6e4eb4312571..c6877fe9a831 100644 --- a/kernel/cgroup.c +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c @@ -2707,6 +2707,14 @@ static void cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists(void) struct task_struct *p, *g; write_lock(&css_set_lock); use_task_css_set_links = 1; + /* + * We need tasklist_lock because RCU is not safe against + * while_each_thread(). Besides, a forking task that has passed + * cgroup_post_fork() without seeing use_task_css_set_links = 1 + * is not guaranteed to have its child immediately visible in the + * tasklist if we walk through it with RCU. + */ + read_lock(&tasklist_lock); do_each_thread(g, p) { task_lock(p); /* @@ -2718,6 +2726,7 @@ static void cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists(void) list_add(&p->cg_list, &p->cgroups->tasks); task_unlock(p); } while_each_thread(g, p); + read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); write_unlock(&css_set_lock); } @@ -4522,6 +4531,17 @@ void cgroup_fork_callbacks(struct task_struct *child) */ void cgroup_post_fork(struct task_struct *child) { + /* + * use_task_css_set_links is set to 1 before we walk the tasklist + * under the tasklist_lock and we read it here after we added the child + * to the tasklist under the tasklist_lock as well. If the child wasn't + * yet in the tasklist when we walked through it from + * cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists(), then use_task_css_set_links value + * should be visible now due to the paired locking and barriers implied + * by LOCK/UNLOCK: it is written before the tasklist_lock unlock + * in cgroup_enable_task_cg_lists() and read here after the tasklist_lock + * lock on fork. + */ if (use_task_css_set_links) { write_lock(&css_set_lock); if (list_empty(&child->cg_list)) {