From: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 04:51:04 +0000 (-0600)
Subject: powerpc/fsl-book3e: Avoid lbarx on e5500
X-Git-Tag: MMI-PSA29.97-13-9~8412^2
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=37c5e942bb2eedd98c1cd1fa1f94d79f6b830c38;p=GitHub%2FMotorolaMobilityLLC%2Fkernel-slsi.git

powerpc/fsl-book3e: Avoid lbarx on e5500

lbarx/stbcx. are implemented on e6500, but not on e5500.
Likewise, SMT is on e6500, but not on e5500.

So, avoid executing an unimplemented instruction by only locking
when needed (i.e. in the presence of SMT).

Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
---

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-book3e.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-book3e.c
index 7e6d0880813f..83a8be791e06 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-book3e.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage-book3e.c
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
 
+#include <asm/mmu.h>
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 static inline int tlb1_next(void)
@@ -60,6 +62,14 @@ static inline void book3e_tlb_lock(void)
 	unsigned long tmp;
 	int token = smp_processor_id() + 1;
 
+	/*
+	 * Besides being unnecessary in the absence of SMT, this
+	 * check prevents trying to do lbarx/stbcx. on e5500 which
+	 * doesn't implement either feature.
+	 */
+	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_SMT))
+		return;
+
 	asm volatile("1: lbarx %0, 0, %1;"
 		     "cmpwi %0, 0;"
 		     "bne 2f;"
@@ -80,6 +90,9 @@ static inline void book3e_tlb_unlock(void)
 {
 	struct paca_struct *paca = get_paca();
 
+	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_SMT))
+		return;
+
 	isync();
 	paca->tcd_ptr->lock = 0;
 }