From: Oleg Nesterov Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:47:36 +0000 (-0700) Subject: ptrace: give more respect to SIGKILL X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=364d3c13c17f45da6d638011078d4c4d3070d719;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git ptrace: give more respect to SIGKILL ptrace_stop() has some complicated checks to prevent the scheduling in the TASK_TRACED state with the pending SIGKILL, but these checks are racy, and they depend on arch_ptrace_stop_needed(). This patch assumes that the traced task should die asap if it was killed by SIGKILL, in that case schedule()->signal_pending_state() has no reason to ignore the TASK_WAKEKILL part of TASK_TRACED, and we can kill this nasty special case. Note: do_exit()->ptrace_notify() is special, the killed task can already dequeue SIGKILL at this point. Another indication that fatal_signal_pending() is not exactly right. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Roland McGrath Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index 6aca4a16e377..79e749dbf81e 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -2054,9 +2054,6 @@ static inline int signal_pending_state(long state, struct task_struct *p) if (!signal_pending(p)) return 0; - if (state & (__TASK_STOPPED | __TASK_TRACED)) - return 0; - return (state & TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) || __fatal_signal_pending(p); }