From: Vladimir Davydov Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 23:53:02 +0000 (-0800) Subject: memcg, slab: fix races in per-memcg cache creation/destruction X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2edefe1155b3ad3dc92065f6e1018d363525296e;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git memcg, slab: fix races in per-memcg cache creation/destruction We obtain a per-memcg cache from a root kmem_cache by dereferencing an entry of the root cache's memcg_params::memcg_caches array. If we find no cache for a memcg there on allocation, we initiate the memcg cache creation (see memcg_kmem_get_cache()). The cache creation proceeds asynchronously in memcg_create_kmem_cache() in order to avoid lock clashes, so there can be several threads trying to create the same kmem_cache concurrently, but only one of them may succeed. However, due to a race in the code, it is not always true. The point is that the memcg_caches array can be relocated when we activate kmem accounting for a memcg (see memcg_update_all_caches(), memcg_update_cache_size()). If memcg_update_cache_size() and memcg_create_kmem_cache() proceed concurrently as described below, we can leak a kmem_cache. Asume two threads schedule creation of the same kmem_cache. One of them successfully creates it. Another one should fail then, but if memcg_create_kmem_cache() interleaves with memcg_update_cache_size() as follows, it won't: memcg_create_kmem_cache() memcg_update_cache_size() (called w/o mutexes held) (called with slab_mutex, set_limit_mutex held) ------------------------- ------------------------- mutex_lock(&memcg_cache_mutex) s->memcg_params=kzalloc(...) new_cachep=cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep,idx) // new_cachep==NULL => proceed to creation s->memcg_params->memcg_caches[i] =cur_params->memcg_caches[i] // kmem_cache_create_memcg takes slab_mutex // so we will hang around until // memcg_update_cache_size finishes, but // nothing will prevent it from succeeding so // memcg_caches[idx] will be overwritten in // memcg_register_cache! new_cachep = kmem_cache_create_memcg(...) mutex_unlock(&memcg_cache_mutex) Let's fix this by moving the check for existence of the memcg cache to kmem_cache_create_memcg() to be called under the slab_mutex and make it return NULL if so. A similar race is possible when destroying a memcg cache (see kmem_cache_destroy()). Since memcg_unregister_cache(), which clears the pointer in the memcg_caches array, is called w/o protection, we can race with memcg_update_cache_size() and omit clearing the pointer. Therefore memcg_unregister_cache() should be moved before we release the slab_mutex. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Glauber Costa Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Balbir Singh Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Pekka Enberg Cc: Christoph Lameter Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 014a4f1acf1c..d2da65c4cd84 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -3264,6 +3264,12 @@ void memcg_register_cache(struct kmem_cache *s) if (is_root_cache(s)) return; + /* + * Holding the slab_mutex assures nobody will touch the memcg_caches + * array while we are modifying it. + */ + lockdep_assert_held(&slab_mutex); + root = s->memcg_params->root_cache; memcg = s->memcg_params->memcg; id = memcg_cache_id(memcg); @@ -3283,6 +3289,7 @@ void memcg_register_cache(struct kmem_cache *s) * before adding it to the memcg_slab_caches list, otherwise we can * fail to convert memcg_params_to_cache() while traversing the list. */ + VM_BUG_ON(root->memcg_params->memcg_caches[id]); root->memcg_params->memcg_caches[id] = s; mutex_lock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex); @@ -3299,6 +3306,12 @@ void memcg_unregister_cache(struct kmem_cache *s) if (is_root_cache(s)) return; + /* + * Holding the slab_mutex assures nobody will touch the memcg_caches + * array while we are modifying it. + */ + lockdep_assert_held(&slab_mutex); + root = s->memcg_params->root_cache; memcg = s->memcg_params->memcg; id = memcg_cache_id(memcg); @@ -3312,6 +3325,7 @@ void memcg_unregister_cache(struct kmem_cache *s) * after removing it from the memcg_slab_caches list, otherwise we can * fail to convert memcg_params_to_cache() while traversing the list. */ + VM_BUG_ON(!root->memcg_params->memcg_caches[id]); root->memcg_params->memcg_caches[id] = NULL; css_put(&memcg->css); @@ -3464,22 +3478,13 @@ static struct kmem_cache *memcg_create_kmem_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct kmem_cache *cachep) { struct kmem_cache *new_cachep; - int idx; BUG_ON(!memcg_can_account_kmem(memcg)); - idx = memcg_cache_id(memcg); - mutex_lock(&memcg_cache_mutex); - new_cachep = cache_from_memcg_idx(cachep, idx); - if (new_cachep) - goto out; - new_cachep = kmem_cache_dup(memcg, cachep); if (new_cachep == NULL) new_cachep = cachep; - -out: mutex_unlock(&memcg_cache_mutex); return new_cachep; } diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c index db24ec48b946..f34707eeacc7 100644 --- a/mm/slab_common.c +++ b/mm/slab_common.c @@ -180,6 +180,18 @@ kmem_cache_create_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const char *name, size_t size, if (err) goto out_unlock; + if (memcg) { + /* + * Since per-memcg caches are created asynchronously on first + * allocation (see memcg_kmem_get_cache()), several threads can + * try to create the same cache, but only one of them may + * succeed. Therefore if we get here and see the cache has + * already been created, we silently return NULL. + */ + if (cache_from_memcg_idx(parent_cache, memcg_cache_id(memcg))) + goto out_unlock; + } + /* * Some allocators will constraint the set of valid flags to a subset * of all flags. We expect them to define CACHE_CREATE_MASK in this @@ -261,11 +273,11 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s) list_del(&s->list); if (!__kmem_cache_shutdown(s)) { + memcg_unregister_cache(s); mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex); if (s->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU) rcu_barrier(); - memcg_unregister_cache(s); memcg_free_cache_params(s); kfree(s->name); kmem_cache_free(kmem_cache, s);