From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 08:24:20 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: KVM: s390: flush CPU on load control
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2dca485f8740208604543c3960be31a5dd3ea603;p=GitHub%2Fexynos8895%2Fandroid_kernel_samsung_universal8895.git

KVM: s390: flush CPU on load control

some control register changes will flush some aspects of the CPU, e.g.
POP explicitely mentions that for CR9-CR11 "TLBs may be cleared".
Instead of trying to be clever and only flush on specific CRs, let
play safe and flush on all lctl(g) as future machines might define
new bits in CRs. Load control intercept should not happen that often.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
index 72bb2dd8b9cd..9c565b6b4ccb 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c
@@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_lctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			break;
 		reg = (reg + 1) % 16;
 	} while (1);
-
+	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH, vcpu);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ static int handle_lctlg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			break;
 		reg = (reg + 1) % 16;
 	} while (1);
-
+	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH, vcpu);
 	return 0;
 }