From: Chunyan Zhang Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:46:42 +0000 (+0800) Subject: arm64: use preempt_disable_notrace in _percpu_read/write X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2b9743441a312e0b0a2d87deae363eccbe9d0f00;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git arm64: use preempt_disable_notrace in _percpu_read/write When debug preempt or preempt tracer is enabled, preempt_count_add/sub() can be traced by function and function graph tracing, and preempt_disable/enable() would call preempt_count_add/sub(), so in Ftrace subsystem we should use preempt_disable/enable_notrace instead. In the commit 345ddcc882d8 ("ftrace: Have set_ftrace_pid use the bitmap like events do") the function this_cpu_read() was added to trace_graph_entry(), and if this_cpu_read() calls preempt_disable(), graph tracer will go into a recursive loop, even if the tracing_on is disabled. So this patch change to use preempt_enable/disable_notrace instead in this_cpu_read(). Since Yonghui Yang helped a lot to find the root cause of this problem, so also add his SOB. Signed-off-by: Yonghui Yang Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang Acked-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas --- diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h index 0a456bef8c79..2fee2f59288c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h @@ -199,19 +199,19 @@ static inline unsigned long __percpu_xchg(void *ptr, unsigned long val, #define _percpu_read(pcp) \ ({ \ typeof(pcp) __retval; \ - preempt_disable(); \ + preempt_disable_notrace(); \ __retval = (typeof(pcp))__percpu_read(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), \ sizeof(pcp)); \ - preempt_enable(); \ + preempt_enable_notrace(); \ __retval; \ }) #define _percpu_write(pcp, val) \ do { \ - preempt_disable(); \ + preempt_disable_notrace(); \ __percpu_write(raw_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)), (unsigned long)(val), \ sizeof(pcp)); \ - preempt_enable(); \ + preempt_enable_notrace(); \ } while(0) \ #define _pcp_protect(operation, pcp, val) \