From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:42:16 +0000 (-0800)
Subject: sched: numa: ksm: fix oops in task_numa_placment()
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2832bc19f6668fd00116f61f821105040599ef8b;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

sched: numa: ksm: fix oops in task_numa_placment()

task_numa_placement() oopsed on NULL p->mm when task_numa_fault() got
called in the handling of break_ksm() for ksmd.  That might be a
peculiar case, which perhaps KSM could takes steps to avoid? but it's
more robust if task_numa_placement() allows for such a possibility.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 4603d6cb9e25..5eea8707234a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -793,8 +793,11 @@ unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay = 1000;
 
 static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	int seq = ACCESS_ONCE(p->mm->numa_scan_seq);
+	int seq;
 
+	if (!p->mm)	/* for example, ksmd faulting in a user's mm */
+		return;
+	seq = ACCESS_ONCE(p->mm->numa_scan_seq);
 	if (p->numa_scan_seq == seq)
 		return;
 	p->numa_scan_seq = seq;