From: Ville Syrjälä Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:26:24 +0000 (+0300) Subject: drm/i915: Make sure we respect n.max on VLV X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=27e639bf024a0706015dbb348eb32619a9bb9329;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git drm/i915: Make sure we respect n.max on VLV We limit the maximum n divider value in order to make sure the PLL's reference inout is at least 19.2 MHz. I assume that is done to satisfy some hardware requirement. However we never check whether that calculated limit is below the maximum supoorted N divider value (7). In practice that is always true since we only support 100 MHz reference clock, but making the code safe against higher reference clocks seems like a reasoanble thing to do. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 62cfada50735..ed95eb25833a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -678,15 +678,16 @@ vlv_find_best_dpll(const intel_limit_t *limit, struct drm_crtc *crtc, intel_clock_t *best_clock) { intel_clock_t clock; - u32 minupdate = 19200; unsigned int bestppm = 1000000; + /* min update 19.2 MHz */ + int max_n = min(limit->n.max, refclk / 19200); target *= 5; /* fast clock */ memset(best_clock, 0, sizeof(*best_clock)); /* based on hardware requirement, prefer smaller n to precision */ - for (clock.n = limit->n.min; clock.n <= ((refclk) / minupdate); clock.n++) { + for (clock.n = limit->n.min; clock.n <= max_n; clock.n++) { for (clock.p1 = limit->p1.max; clock.p1 > limit->p1.min; clock.p1--) { for (clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_fast; clock.p2 > 0; clock.p2 -= clock.p2 > 10 ? 2 : 1) {