From: Nishanth Menon Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 14:50:09 +0000 (-0600) Subject: regulator: ti-abb: Fix array out of bound read access on the first transition X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=274663e922110cff99046ddce533899118f9215f;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git regulator: ti-abb: Fix array out of bound read access on the first transition [ Upstream commit 2ba546ebe0ce2af47833d8912ced9b4a579f13cb ] At the start of driver initialization, we do not know what bias setting the bootloader has configured the system for and we only know for certain the very first time we do a transition. However, since the initial value of the comparison index is -EINVAL, this negative value results in an array out of bound access on the very first transition. Since we don't know what the setting is, we just set the bias configuration as there is nothing to compare against. This prevents the array out of bound access. NOTE: Even though we could use a more relaxed check of "< 0" the only valid values(ignoring cosmic ray induced bitflips) are -EINVAL, 0+. Fixes: 40b1936efebd ("regulator: Introduce TI Adaptive Body Bias(ABB) on-chip LDO driver") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CA+G9fYuk4imvhyCN7D7T6PMDH6oNp6HDCRiTUKMQ6QXXjBa4ag@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201118145009.10492-1-nm@ti.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- diff --git a/drivers/regulator/ti-abb-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/ti-abb-regulator.c index 6d17357b3a24..5f5f63eb8c76 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/ti-abb-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/ti-abb-regulator.c @@ -342,8 +342,17 @@ static int ti_abb_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned sel) return ret; } - /* If data is exactly the same, then just update index, no change */ info = &abb->info[sel]; + /* + * When Linux kernel is starting up, we are'nt sure of the + * Bias configuration that bootloader has configured. + * So, we get to know the actual setting the first time + * we are asked to transition. + */ + if (abb->current_info_idx == -EINVAL) + goto just_set_abb; + + /* If data is exactly the same, then just update index, no change */ oinfo = &abb->info[abb->current_info_idx]; if (!memcmp(info, oinfo, sizeof(*info))) { dev_dbg(dev, "%s: Same data new idx=%d, old idx=%d\n", __func__, @@ -351,6 +360,7 @@ static int ti_abb_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned sel) goto out; } +just_set_abb: ret = ti_abb_set_opp(rdev, abb, info); out: