From: Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:55:03 +0000 (-0600)
Subject: [POWERPC] pSeries: EEH improperly enabled for some Power4 systems
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=25c4a46f0ed8ece9ac6699e200fcc83a4642dce7;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

[POWERPC] pSeries: EEH improperly enabled for some Power4 systems

It appears that EEH is improperly enabled for some Power4 systems.
On these systems, the ibm,set-eeh-option returns a value of success
even when EEH is not supported on the given node. Thus, an explicit
check for support is required.

During boot, on power4, without this patch, one sees messages
similar to:

EEH: event on unsupported device, rc=0 dn=/pci@400000000110/IBM,sp@1
EEH: event on unsupported device, rc=0 dn=/pci@400000000110/pci@2
EEH: event on unsupported device, rc=0 dn=/pci@400000000110/pci@2,2
etc.

The patch makes these go away.

Without this patch, EEH recovery does seem to work correctly for
at least some devices (I tested ethernet e1000), but fails to
recover others (the Emulex LightPulse LPFC, most notably).
Off the top of my head, I don't remember why some devices are
affected, but not others.

The PAPR indicates that the correct way to test for EEH is as
done in this patch; its not clear to me if this was in the PAPR
all along, or recently added; if it was there all along, its not
clear to me why this hadn't been fixed long ago. I suspect only
certain firmware levels are affected.

Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
---

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c
index da6e5362e7cd..9437f48cc9e7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c
@@ -747,6 +747,7 @@ struct eeh_early_enable_info {
 /* Enable eeh for the given device node. */
 static void *early_enable_eeh(struct device_node *dn, void *data)
 {
+	unsigned int rets[3];
 	struct eeh_early_enable_info *info = data;
 	int ret;
 	const char *status = get_property(dn, "status", NULL);
@@ -803,16 +804,14 @@ static void *early_enable_eeh(struct device_node *dn, void *data)
 		                regs[0], info->buid_hi, info->buid_lo,
 		                EEH_ENABLE);
 
+		enable = 0;
 		if (ret == 0) {
-			eeh_subsystem_enabled = 1;
-			pdn->eeh_mode |= EEH_MODE_SUPPORTED;
 			pdn->eeh_config_addr = regs[0];
 
 			/* If the newer, better, ibm,get-config-addr-info is supported, 
 			 * then use that instead. */
 			pdn->eeh_pe_config_addr = 0;
 			if (ibm_get_config_addr_info != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
-				unsigned int rets[2];
 				ret = rtas_call (ibm_get_config_addr_info, 4, 2, rets, 
 					pdn->eeh_config_addr, 
 					info->buid_hi, info->buid_lo,
@@ -820,6 +819,20 @@ static void *early_enable_eeh(struct device_node *dn, void *data)
 				if (ret == 0)
 					pdn->eeh_pe_config_addr = rets[0];
 			}
+
+			/* Some older systems (Power4) allow the
+			 * ibm,set-eeh-option call to succeed even on nodes
+			 * where EEH is not supported. Verify support
+			 * explicitly. */
+			ret = read_slot_reset_state(pdn, rets);
+			if ((ret == 0) && (rets[1] == 1))
+				enable = 1;
+		}
+
+		if (enable) {
+			eeh_subsystem_enabled = 1;
+			pdn->eeh_mode |= EEH_MODE_SUPPORTED;
+
 #ifdef DEBUG
 			printk(KERN_DEBUG "EEH: %s: eeh enabled, config=%x pe_config=%x\n",
 			       dn->full_name, pdn->eeh_config_addr, pdn->eeh_pe_config_addr);