From: Tejun Heo Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:29:58 +0000 (-0700) Subject: workqueue: restructure pool / pool_workqueue iterations in freeze/thaw functions X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=24b8a84718ed28a51b452881612c267ba3f2b263;p=GitHub%2Fexynos8895%2Fandroid_kernel_samsung_universal8895.git workqueue: restructure pool / pool_workqueue iterations in freeze/thaw functions The three freeze/thaw related functions - freeze_workqueues_begin(), freeze_workqueues_busy() and thaw_workqueues() - need to iterate through all pool_workqueues of all freezable workqueues. They did it by first iterating pools and then visiting all pwqs (pool_workqueues) of all workqueues and process it if its pwq->pool matches the current pool. This is rather backwards and done this way partly because workqueue didn't have fitting iteration helpers and partly to avoid the number of lock operations on pool->lock. Workqueue now has fitting iterators and the locking operation overhead isn't anything to worry about - those locks are unlikely to be contended and the same CPU visiting the same set of locks multiple times isn't expensive. Restructure the three functions such that the flow better matches the logical steps and pwq iteration is done using for_each_pwq() inside workqueue iteration. * freeze_workqueues_begin(): Setting of FREEZING is moved into a separate for_each_pool() iteration. pwq iteration for clearing max_active is updated as described above. * freeze_workqueues_busy(): pwq iteration updated as described above. * thaw_workqueues(): The single for_each_wq_cpu() iteration is broken into three discrete steps - clearing FREEZING, restoring max_active, and kicking workers. The first and last steps use for_each_pool() and the second step uses pwq iteration described above. This makes the code easier to understand and removes the use of for_each_wq_cpu() for walking pwqs, which can't support multiple unbound pwqs which will be needed to implement unbound workqueues with custom attributes. This patch doesn't introduce any visible behavior changes. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan --- diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 55494e3f9f3b..8942cc74d83b 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -3595,6 +3595,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_on_cpu); void freeze_workqueues_begin(void) { struct worker_pool *pool; + struct workqueue_struct *wq; + struct pool_workqueue *pwq; int id; spin_lock_irq(&workqueue_lock); @@ -3602,23 +3604,24 @@ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void) WARN_ON_ONCE(workqueue_freezing); workqueue_freezing = true; + /* set FREEZING */ for_each_pool(pool, id) { - struct workqueue_struct *wq; - spin_lock(&pool->lock); - WARN_ON_ONCE(pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING); pool->flags |= POOL_FREEZING; + spin_unlock(&pool->lock); + } - list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) { - struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_pwq(pool->cpu, wq); + /* suppress further executions by setting max_active to zero */ + list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) { + if (!(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE)) + continue; - if (pwq && pwq->pool == pool && - (wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE)) - pwq->max_active = 0; + for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) { + spin_lock(&pwq->pool->lock); + pwq->max_active = 0; + spin_unlock(&pwq->pool->lock); } - - spin_unlock(&pool->lock); } spin_unlock_irq(&workqueue_lock); @@ -3639,25 +3642,22 @@ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void) */ bool freeze_workqueues_busy(void) { - unsigned int cpu; bool busy = false; + struct workqueue_struct *wq; + struct pool_workqueue *pwq; spin_lock_irq(&workqueue_lock); WARN_ON_ONCE(!workqueue_freezing); - for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) { - struct workqueue_struct *wq; + list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) { + if (!(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE)) + continue; /* * nr_active is monotonically decreasing. It's safe * to peek without lock. */ - list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) { - struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_pwq(cpu, wq); - - if (!pwq || !(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE)) - continue; - + for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) { WARN_ON_ONCE(pwq->nr_active < 0); if (pwq->nr_active) { busy = true; @@ -3681,40 +3681,43 @@ out_unlock: */ void thaw_workqueues(void) { - unsigned int cpu; + struct workqueue_struct *wq; + struct pool_workqueue *pwq; + struct worker_pool *pool; + int id; spin_lock_irq(&workqueue_lock); if (!workqueue_freezing) goto out_unlock; - for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) { - struct worker_pool *pool; - struct workqueue_struct *wq; - - for_each_std_worker_pool(pool, cpu) { - spin_lock(&pool->lock); - - WARN_ON_ONCE(!(pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING)); - pool->flags &= ~POOL_FREEZING; - - list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) { - struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_pwq(cpu, wq); - - if (!pwq || pwq->pool != pool || - !(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE)) - continue; - - /* restore max_active and repopulate worklist */ - pwq_set_max_active(pwq, wq->saved_max_active); - } + /* clear FREEZING */ + for_each_pool(pool, id) { + spin_lock(&pool->lock); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!(pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING)); + pool->flags &= ~POOL_FREEZING; + spin_unlock(&pool->lock); + } - wake_up_worker(pool); + /* restore max_active and repopulate worklist */ + list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) { + if (!(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE)) + continue; - spin_unlock(&pool->lock); + for_each_pwq(pwq, wq) { + spin_lock(&pwq->pool->lock); + pwq_set_max_active(pwq, wq->saved_max_active); + spin_unlock(&pwq->pool->lock); } } + /* kick workers */ + for_each_pool(pool, id) { + spin_lock(&pool->lock); + wake_up_worker(pool); + spin_unlock(&pool->lock); + } + workqueue_freezing = false; out_unlock: spin_unlock_irq(&workqueue_lock);