From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:43:14 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: carl9170: Fix tx aggregation problems with some clients
X-Git-Tag: MMI-PSA29.97-13-9~19990^2~24^2~1
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=24047e2c4feb8c126e92cc5bb7a863115c89bd72;p=GitHub%2FMotorolaMobilityLLC%2Fkernel-slsi.git

carl9170: Fix tx aggregation problems with some clients

Some clients seem to rely upon the reception of BlockAckReqs to flush
their rx reorder buffer. In order to fix aggregation for these clients
carl9170 should set IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK to generate a
BlockAckReq if the transmission of an AMPDU subframe fails.

This fixes aggregation problems with Intel 5100 Windows STAs (and maybe
others as well).

Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
---

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/carl9170.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/carl9170.h
index c6a5fae634a0..9cad061cc1d2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/carl9170.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/carl9170.h
@@ -443,6 +443,7 @@ struct carl9170_ba_stats {
 	u8 ampdu_len;
 	u8 ampdu_ack_len;
 	bool clear;
+	bool req;
 };
 
 struct carl9170_sta_info {
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/main.c
index ede3d7e5a048..89fe60accf85 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/main.c
@@ -1355,6 +1355,7 @@ static int carl9170_op_ampdu_action(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 		tid_info = rcu_dereference(sta_info->agg[tid]);
 
 		sta_info->stats[tid].clear = true;
+		sta_info->stats[tid].req = false;
 
 		if (tid_info) {
 			bitmap_zero(tid_info->bitmap, CARL9170_BAW_SIZE);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c
index 0ef70b6fc512..cb70ed7ec5cc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c
@@ -383,6 +383,7 @@ static void carl9170_tx_status_process_ampdu(struct ar9170 *ar,
 
 	if (sta_info->stats[tid].clear) {
 		sta_info->stats[tid].clear = false;
+		sta_info->stats[tid].req = false;
 		sta_info->stats[tid].ampdu_len = 0;
 		sta_info->stats[tid].ampdu_ack_len = 0;
 	}
@@ -391,10 +392,16 @@ static void carl9170_tx_status_process_ampdu(struct ar9170 *ar,
 	if (txinfo->status.rates[0].count == 1)
 		sta_info->stats[tid].ampdu_ack_len++;
 
+	if (!(txinfo->flags & IEEE80211_TX_STAT_ACK))
+		sta_info->stats[tid].req = true;
+
 	if (super->f.mac_control & cpu_to_le16(AR9170_TX_MAC_IMM_BA)) {
 		super->s.rix = sta_info->stats[tid].ampdu_len;
 		super->s.cnt = sta_info->stats[tid].ampdu_ack_len;
 		txinfo->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU;
+		if (sta_info->stats[tid].req)
+			txinfo->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK;
+
 		sta_info->stats[tid].clear = true;
 	}
 	spin_unlock_bh(&tid_info->lock);