From: David Brownell Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 18:21:52 +0000 (-0800) Subject: [PATCH] dma doc updates X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=21440d313358043b0ce5e43b00ff3c9b35a8616c;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git [PATCH] dma doc updates This updates the DMA API documentation to address a few issues: - The dma_map_sg() call results are used like pci_map_sg() results: using sg_dma_address() and sg_dma_len(). That's not wholly obvious to folk reading _only_ the "new" DMA-API.txt writeup. - Buffers allocated by dma_alloc_coherent() may not be completely free of coherency concerns ... some CPUs also have write buffers that may need to be flushed. - Cacheline coherence issues are now mentioned as being among issues which affect dma buffers, and complicate/prevent using of static and (especially) stack based buffers with the DMA calls. I don't think many drivers currently need to worry about flushing write buffers, but I did hit it with one SOC using external SDRAM for DMA descriptors: without explicit writebuffer flushing, the on-chip DMA controller accessed descriptors before the CPU completed the writes. Signed-off-by: David Brownell Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- diff --git a/Documentation/DMA-API.txt b/Documentation/DMA-API.txt index 1af0f2d50220..2ffb0d62f0fe 100644 --- a/Documentation/DMA-API.txt +++ b/Documentation/DMA-API.txt @@ -33,7 +33,9 @@ pci_alloc_consistent(struct pci_dev *dev, size_t size, Consistent memory is memory for which a write by either the device or the processor can immediately be read by the processor or device -without having to worry about caching effects. +without having to worry about caching effects. (You may however need +to make sure to flush the processor's write buffers before telling +devices to read that memory.) This routine allocates a region of bytes of consistent memory. it also returns a which may be cast to an unsigned @@ -304,12 +306,12 @@ dma address with dma_mapping_error(). A non zero return value means the mapping could not be created and the driver should take appropriate action (eg reduce current DMA mapping usage or delay and try again later). -int -dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nents, - enum dma_data_direction direction) -int -pci_map_sg(struct pci_dev *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg, - int nents, int direction) + int + dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, + int nents, enum dma_data_direction direction) + int + pci_map_sg(struct pci_dev *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg, + int nents, int direction) Maps a scatter gather list from the block layer. @@ -327,12 +329,33 @@ critical that the driver do something, in the case of a block driver aborting the request or even oopsing is better than doing nothing and corrupting the filesystem. -void -dma_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nhwentries, - enum dma_data_direction direction) -void -pci_unmap_sg(struct pci_dev *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg, - int nents, int direction) +With scatterlists, you use the resulting mapping like this: + + int i, count = dma_map_sg(dev, sglist, nents, direction); + struct scatterlist *sg; + + for (i = 0, sg = sglist; i < count; i++, sg++) { + hw_address[i] = sg_dma_address(sg); + hw_len[i] = sg_dma_len(sg); + } + +where nents is the number of entries in the sglist. + +The implementation is free to merge several consecutive sglist entries +into one (e.g. with an IOMMU, or if several pages just happen to be +physically contiguous) and returns the actual number of sg entries it +mapped them to. On failure 0, is returned. + +Then you should loop count times (note: this can be less than nents times) +and use sg_dma_address() and sg_dma_len() macros where you previously +accessed sg->address and sg->length as shown above. + + void + dma_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, + int nhwentries, enum dma_data_direction direction) + void + pci_unmap_sg(struct pci_dev *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg, + int nents, int direction) unmap the previously mapped scatter/gather list. All the parameters must be the same as those and passed in to the scatter/gather mapping diff --git a/Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt b/Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt index 10bf4deb96aa..7c717699032c 100644 --- a/Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt +++ b/Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt @@ -58,11 +58,15 @@ translating each of those pages back to a kernel address using something like __va(). [ EDIT: Update this when we integrate Gerd Knorr's generic code which does this. ] -This rule also means that you may not use kernel image addresses -(ie. items in the kernel's data/text/bss segment, or your driver's) -nor may you use kernel stack addresses for DMA. Both of these items -might be mapped somewhere entirely different than the rest of physical -memory. +This rule also means that you may use neither kernel image addresses +(items in data/text/bss segments), nor module image addresses, nor +stack addresses for DMA. These could all be mapped somewhere entirely +different than the rest of physical memory. Even if those classes of +memory could physically work with DMA, you'd need to ensure the I/O +buffers were cacheline-aligned. Without that, you'd see cacheline +sharing problems (data corruption) on CPUs with DMA-incoherent caches. +(The CPU could write to one word, DMA would write to a different one +in the same cache line, and one of them could be overwritten.) Also, this means that you cannot take the return of a kmap() call and DMA to/from that. This is similar to vmalloc(). @@ -284,6 +288,11 @@ There are two types of DMA mappings: in order to get correct behavior on all platforms. + Also, on some platforms your driver may need to flush CPU write + buffers in much the same way as it needs to flush write buffers + found in PCI bridges (such as by reading a register's value + after writing it). + - Streaming DMA mappings which are usually mapped for one DMA transfer, unmapped right after it (unless you use pci_dma_sync_* below) and for which hardware can optimize for sequential accesses. @@ -303,6 +312,9 @@ There are two types of DMA mappings: Neither type of DMA mapping has alignment restrictions that come from PCI, although some devices may have such restrictions. +Also, systems with caches that aren't DMA-coherent will work better +when the underlying buffers don't share cache lines with other data. + Using Consistent DMA mappings.