From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:23:08 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: bpf: fix missing error return in check_stack_boundary()
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2120fca0ecfb4552d27608d409ebd3403ce02ce4;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

bpf: fix missing error return in check_stack_boundary()


From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>

Prevent indirect stack accesses at non-constant addresses, which would
permit reading and corrupting spilled pointers.

Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 0c7e4c8a2b8a..8aa98a0591d6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1303,6 +1303,7 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
 		tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), regs[regno].var_off);
 		verbose("invalid variable stack read R%d var_off=%s\n",
 			regno, tn_buf);
+		return -EACCES;
 	}
 	off = regs[regno].off + regs[regno].var_off.value;
 	if (off >= 0 || off < -MAX_BPF_STACK || off + access_size > 0 ||