From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 05:30:26 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: memcg: make it work on sparse non-0-node systems
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1bd33537171499e1ed0528442d31fc1d5698b4c8;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

memcg: make it work on sparse non-0-node systems

commit 3e8589963773a5c23e2f1fe4bcad0e9a90b7f471 upstream.

We have a single node system with node 0 disabled:
  Scanning NUMA topology in Northbridge 24
  Number of physical nodes 2
  Skipping disabled node 0
  Node 1 MemBase 0000000000000000 Limit 00000000fbff0000
  NODE_DATA(1) allocated [mem 0xfbfda000-0xfbfeffff]

This causes crashes in memcg when system boots:
  BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
  #PF error: [normal kernel read fault]
...
  RIP: 0010:list_lru_add+0x94/0x170
...
  Call Trace:
   d_lru_add+0x44/0x50
   dput.part.34+0xfc/0x110
   __fput+0x108/0x230
   task_work_run+0x9f/0xc0
   exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf5/0x100

It is reproducible as far as 4.12.  I did not try older kernels.  You have
to have a new enough systemd, e.g.  241 (the reason is unknown -- was not
investigated).  Cannot be reproduced with systemd 234.

The system crashes because the size of lru array is never updated in
memcg_update_all_list_lrus and the reads are past the zero-sized array,
causing dereferences of random memory.

The root cause are list_lru_memcg_aware checks in the list_lru code.  The
test in list_lru_memcg_aware is broken: it assumes node 0 is always
present, but it is not true on some systems as can be seen above.

So fix this by avoiding checks on node 0.  Remember the memcg-awareness by
a bool flag in struct list_lru.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190522091940.3615-1-jslaby@suse.cz
Fixes: 60d3fd32a7a9 ("list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Suggested-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---

diff --git a/include/linux/list_lru.h b/include/linux/list_lru.h
index bb8129a3474d..7fbea46cf9ee 100644
--- a/include/linux/list_lru.h
+++ b/include/linux/list_lru.h
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct list_lru {
 	struct list_lru_node	*node;
 #if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG) && !defined(CONFIG_SLOB)
 	struct list_head	list;
+	bool			memcg_aware;
 #endif
 };
 
diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c
index f141f0c80ff3..dc19694d0e92 100644
--- a/mm/list_lru.c
+++ b/mm/list_lru.c
@@ -42,11 +42,7 @@ static void list_lru_unregister(struct list_lru *lru)
 #if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG) && !defined(CONFIG_SLOB)
 static inline bool list_lru_memcg_aware(struct list_lru *lru)
 {
-	/*
-	 * This needs node 0 to be always present, even
-	 * in the systems supporting sparse numa ids.
-	 */
-	return !!lru->node[0].memcg_lrus;
+	return lru->memcg_aware;
 }
 
 static inline struct list_lru_one *
@@ -389,6 +385,8 @@ static int memcg_init_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, bool memcg_aware)
 {
 	int i;
 
+	lru->memcg_aware = memcg_aware;
+
 	if (!memcg_aware)
 		return 0;