From: Jesper Juhl Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 00:05:31 +0000 (+0100) Subject: x86: Use "do { } while(0)" for empty lock_cmos()/unlock_cmos() macros X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1affc46cffad9f2bc7c9ffec85726446903a58f9;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git x86: Use "do { } while(0)" for empty lock_cmos()/unlock_cmos() macros gcc noticed (when using -Wempty-body) that our use of lock_cmos() and unlock_cmos() in arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h is potentially problematic : arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h:32:15: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ¡else¢ statement [-Wempty-body] arch/x86/include/asm/mach_traps.h:40:16: warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ¡else¢ statement [-Wempty-body] Let's just use the standard 'do {} while (0)' solution. That shuts up gcc and also prevents future problems if the macros should end up being used in a similar situation elsewhere. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LNX.2.00.1112180103130.21784@swampdragon.chaosbits.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h index 01fdf5674e24..0e8e85bb7c51 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mc146818rtc.h @@ -81,8 +81,8 @@ static inline unsigned char current_lock_cmos_reg(void) #else #define lock_cmos_prefix(reg) do {} while (0) #define lock_cmos_suffix(reg) do {} while (0) -#define lock_cmos(reg) -#define unlock_cmos() +#define lock_cmos(reg) do { } while (0) +#define unlock_cmos() do { } while (0) #define do_i_have_lock_cmos() 0 #define current_lock_cmos_reg() 0 #endif