From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 23:29:03 +0000 (+1000)
Subject: powerpc/eeh: Report frozen parent PE prior to child PE
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1ad7a72c5;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2FG12%2Fandroid_kernel_amlogic_linux-4.9.git

powerpc/eeh: Report frozen parent PE prior to child PE

When we have the corner case of frozen parent and child PE at the
same time, we have to handle the frozen parent PE prior to the
child. Without clearning the frozen state on parent PE, the child
PE can't be recovered successfully.

The patch searches the EEH PE hierarchy tree and returns the toppest
frozen PE to be handled. It ensures the frozen parent PE will be
handled prior to child PE.

Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
index 7051ea3101b9..c25064b7d667 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
@@ -358,10 +358,11 @@ out:
 int eeh_dev_check_failure(struct eeh_dev *edev)
 {
 	int ret;
+	int active_flags = (EEH_STATE_MMIO_ACTIVE | EEH_STATE_DMA_ACTIVE);
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct device_node *dn;
 	struct pci_dev *dev;
-	struct eeh_pe *pe;
+	struct eeh_pe *pe, *parent_pe;
 	int rc = 0;
 	const char *location;
 
@@ -439,14 +440,34 @@ int eeh_dev_check_failure(struct eeh_dev *edev)
 	 */
 	if ((ret < 0) ||
 	    (ret == EEH_STATE_NOT_SUPPORT) ||
-	    (ret & (EEH_STATE_MMIO_ACTIVE | EEH_STATE_DMA_ACTIVE)) ==
-	    (EEH_STATE_MMIO_ACTIVE | EEH_STATE_DMA_ACTIVE)) {
+	    ((ret & active_flags) == active_flags)) {
 		eeh_stats.false_positives++;
 		pe->false_positives++;
 		rc = 0;
 		goto dn_unlock;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * It should be corner case that the parent PE has been
+	 * put into frozen state as well. We should take care
+	 * that at first.
+	 */
+	parent_pe = pe->parent;
+	while (parent_pe) {
+		/* Hit the ceiling ? */
+		if (parent_pe->type & EEH_PE_PHB)
+			break;
+
+		/* Frozen parent PE ? */
+		ret = eeh_ops->get_state(parent_pe, NULL);
+		if (ret > 0 &&
+		    (ret & active_flags) != active_flags)
+			pe = parent_pe;
+
+		/* Next parent level */
+		parent_pe = parent_pe->parent;
+	}
+
 	eeh_stats.slot_resets++;
 
 	/* Avoid repeated reports of this failure, including problems
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
index e0d6a3a213e2..68167cd9ea97 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
@@ -705,11 +705,12 @@ static int ioda_eeh_next_error(struct eeh_pe **pe)
 {
 	struct pci_controller *hose;
 	struct pnv_phb *phb;
-	struct eeh_pe *phb_pe;
+	struct eeh_pe *phb_pe, *parent_pe;
 	__be64 frozen_pe_no;
 	__be16 err_type, severity;
+	int active_flags = (EEH_STATE_MMIO_ACTIVE | EEH_STATE_DMA_ACTIVE);
 	long rc;
-	int ret = EEH_NEXT_ERR_NONE;
+	int state, ret = EEH_NEXT_ERR_NONE;
 
 	/*
 	 * While running here, it's safe to purge the event queue.
@@ -838,6 +839,31 @@ static int ioda_eeh_next_error(struct eeh_pe **pe)
 			ioda_eeh_phb_diag(hose);
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * We probably have the frozen parent PE out there and
+		 * we need have to handle frozen parent PE firstly.
+		 */
+		if (ret == EEH_NEXT_ERR_FROZEN_PE) {
+			parent_pe = (*pe)->parent;
+			while (parent_pe) {
+				/* Hit the ceiling ? */
+				if (parent_pe->type & EEH_PE_PHB)
+					break;
+
+				/* Frozen parent PE ? */
+				state = ioda_eeh_get_state(parent_pe);
+				if (state > 0 &&
+				    (state & active_flags) != active_flags)
+					*pe = parent_pe;
+
+				/* Next parent level */
+				parent_pe = parent_pe->parent;
+			}
+
+			/* We possibly migrate to another PE */
+			eeh_pe_state_mark(*pe, EEH_PE_ISOLATED);
+		}
+
 		/*
 		 * If we have no errors on the specific PHB or only
 		 * informative error there, we continue poking it.