From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 10:53:50 +0000 (+0200) Subject: sched/core: Implement new approach to scale select_idle_cpu() X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1ad3aaf3fcd2444406628a19a9b9e0922b95e2d4;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git sched/core: Implement new approach to scale select_idle_cpu() Hackbench recently suffered a bunch of pain, first by commit: 4c77b18cf8b7 ("sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() more aggressive") and then by commit: c743f0a5c50f ("sched/fair, cpumask: Export for_each_cpu_wrap()") which fixed a bug in the initial for_each_cpu_wrap() implementation that made select_idle_cpu() even more expensive. The bug was that it would skip over CPUs when bits were consequtive in the bitmask. This however gave me an idea to fix select_idle_cpu(); where the old scheme was a cliff-edge throttle on idle scanning, this introduces a more gradual approach. Instead of stopping to scan entirely, we limit how many CPUs we scan. Initial benchmarks show that it mostly recovers hackbench while not hurting anything else, except Mason's schbench, but not as bad as the old thing. It also appears to recover the tbench high-end, which also suffered like hackbench. Tested-by: Matt Fleming Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Chris Mason Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: hpa@zytor.com Cc: kitsunyan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: lvenanci@redhat.com Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: xiaolong.ye@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170517105350.hk5m4h4jb6dfr65a@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 47a0c552c77b..396bca9c7996 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -5794,27 +5794,38 @@ static inline int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target) { struct sched_domain *this_sd; - u64 avg_cost, avg_idle = this_rq()->avg_idle; + u64 avg_cost, avg_idle; u64 time, cost; s64 delta; - int cpu; + int cpu, nr = INT_MAX; this_sd = rcu_dereference(*this_cpu_ptr(&sd_llc)); if (!this_sd) return -1; - avg_cost = this_sd->avg_scan_cost; - /* * Due to large variance we need a large fuzz factor; hackbench in * particularly is sensitive here. */ - if (sched_feat(SIS_AVG_CPU) && (avg_idle / 512) < avg_cost) + avg_idle = this_rq()->avg_idle / 512; + avg_cost = this_sd->avg_scan_cost + 1; + + if (sched_feat(SIS_AVG_CPU) && avg_idle < avg_cost) return -1; + if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) { + u64 span_avg = sd->span_weight * avg_idle; + if (span_avg > 4*avg_cost) + nr = div_u64(span_avg, avg_cost); + else + nr = 4; + } + time = local_clock(); for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd), target) { + if (!--nr) + return -1; if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &p->cpus_allowed)) continue; if (idle_cpu(cpu)) diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h index dc4d1483b038..d3fb15555291 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/features.h +++ b/kernel/sched/features.h @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_QUEUE, true) * When doing wakeups, attempt to limit superfluous scans of the LLC domain. */ SCHED_FEAT(SIS_AVG_CPU, false) +SCHED_FEAT(SIS_PROP, true) /* * Issue a WARN when we do multiple update_rq_clock() calls