From: Chris Wilson Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 14:05:23 +0000 (+0100) Subject: drm/i915: Allow execbuffer to use the first object as the batch X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1a71cf2fa646799d4397a49b223549d8617fece0;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git drm/i915: Allow execbuffer to use the first object as the batch Currently, the last object in the execlist is the always the batch. However, when building the batch buffer we often know the batch object first and if we can use the first slot in the execlist we can emit relocation instructions relative to it immediately and avoid a separate pass to adjust the relocations to point to the last execlist slot. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c index e33a2ed9244c..3c2af70034cf 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c @@ -367,6 +367,7 @@ static int i915_getparam(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, case I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_ASYNC: case I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_FENCE: case I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CAPTURE: + case I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_BATCH_FIRST: /* For the time being all of these are always true; * if some supported hardware does not have one of these * features this value needs to be provided from diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c index f4b02ef3987f..e262133a7cf5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c @@ -645,7 +645,10 @@ ht_needs_resize(const struct i915_gem_context_vma_lut *lut) static unsigned int eb_batch_index(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb) { - return eb->buffer_count - 1; + if (eb->args->flags & I915_EXEC_BATCH_FIRST) + return 0; + else + return eb->buffer_count - 1; } static int eb_select_context(struct i915_execbuffer *eb) diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h index 15bc9f78ba4d..7ccbd6a2bbe0 100644 --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h @@ -418,7 +418,6 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_irq_wait { */ #define I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CAPTURE 45 -/* Query the mask of slices available for this system */ #define I915_PARAM_SLICE_MASK 46 /* Assuming it's uniform for each slice, this queries the mask of subslices @@ -426,6 +425,12 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_irq_wait { */ #define I915_PARAM_SUBSLICE_MASK 47 +/* + * Query whether DRM_I915_GEM_EXECBUFFER2 supports supplying the batch buffer + * as the first execobject as opposed to the last. See I915_EXEC_BATCH_FIRST. + */ +#define I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_BATCH_FIRST 48 + typedef struct drm_i915_getparam { __s32 param; /* @@ -912,7 +917,17 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 { */ #define I915_EXEC_FENCE_OUT (1<<17) -#define __I915_EXEC_UNKNOWN_FLAGS (-(I915_EXEC_FENCE_OUT<<1)) +/* + * Traditionally the execbuf ioctl has only considered the final element in + * the execobject[] to be the executable batch. Often though, the client + * will known the batch object prior to construction and being able to place + * it into the execobject[] array first can simplify the relocation tracking. + * Setting I915_EXEC_BATCH_FIRST tells execbuf to use element 0 of the + * execobject[] as the * batch instead (the default is to use the last + * element). + */ +#define I915_EXEC_BATCH_FIRST (1<<18) +#define __I915_EXEC_UNKNOWN_FLAGS (-(I915_EXEC_BATCH_FIRST<<1)) #define I915_EXEC_CONTEXT_ID_MASK (0xffffffff) #define i915_execbuffer2_set_context_id(eb2, context) \