From: Gerrit Renker Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:53:48 +0000 (-0800) Subject: [DCCP]: Revert patch which disables bidirectional mode X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=151a99317ee9efcfd3e642da62e1edf4f47fcb3e;p=GitHub%2FLineageOS%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git [DCCP]: Revert patch which disables bidirectional mode This reverts an earlier patch which disabled bidirectional mode, meaning that a listening (passive) socket was not allowed to write to the other (active) end of the connection. This mode had been disabled when there were problems with CCID3, but it imposes a constraint on socket programming and thus hinders deployment. A change is included to ignore RX feedback received by the TX CCID3 module. Many thanks to Andre Noll for pointing out this issue. Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c index 5361a4d8e13b..746f79d104b3 100644 --- a/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c +++ b/net/dccp/ccids/ccid3.c @@ -545,12 +545,7 @@ static void ccid3_hc_tx_packet_recv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) /* set idle flag */ hctx->ccid3hctx_idle = 1; break; - case TFRC_SSTATE_NO_SENT: - /* - * XXX when implementing bidirectional rx/tx check this again - */ - DCCP_WARN("Illegal ACK received - no packet sent\n"); - /* fall through */ + case TFRC_SSTATE_NO_SENT: /* fall through */ case TFRC_SSTATE_TERM: /* ignore feedback when closing */ break; } diff --git a/net/dccp/input.c b/net/dccp/input.c index 287099f7f042..78b043c458bf 100644 --- a/net/dccp/input.c +++ b/net/dccp/input.c @@ -248,18 +248,8 @@ int dccp_rcv_established(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, DCCP_ACKVEC_STATE_RECEIVED)) goto discard; - /* - * Deliver to the CCID module in charge. - * FIXME: Currently DCCP operates one-directional only, i.e. a listening - * server is not at the same time a connecting client. There is - * not much sense in delivering to both rx/tx sides at the moment - * (only one is active at a time); when moving to bidirectional - * service, this needs to be revised. - */ - if (dccp_sk(sk)->dccps_role == DCCP_ROLE_CLIENT) - ccid_hc_tx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid, sk, skb); - else /* listening or connected server */ - ccid_hc_rx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ccid, sk, skb); + ccid_hc_rx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ccid, sk, skb); + ccid_hc_tx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid, sk, skb); return __dccp_rcv_established(sk, skb, dh, len); discard: @@ -494,11 +484,8 @@ int dccp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, DCCP_ACKVEC_STATE_RECEIVED)) goto discard; - /* XXX see the comments in dccp_rcv_established about this */ - if (dccp_sk(sk)->dccps_role == DCCP_ROLE_CLIENT) - ccid_hc_tx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid, sk, skb); - else - ccid_hc_rx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ccid, sk, skb); + ccid_hc_rx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_rx_ccid, sk, skb); + ccid_hc_tx_packet_recv(dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid, sk, skb); } /*