From: Paul Gortmaker Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:45:02 +0000 (-0500) Subject: cpufreq: make ti-cpufreq explicitly non-modular X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=149ab8649667eb50863495d841a7ba1110fc17d3;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git cpufreq: make ti-cpufreq explicitly non-modular The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm:config ARM_TI_CPUFREQ drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm: bool "Texas Instruments CPUFreq support" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the couple traces of modular infrastructure use, so that when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only. Since module_init translates to device_initcall in the non-modular case, the init ordering remains unchanged with this commit. We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information is already contained at the top of the file in the comments. Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c index 7ff7ae3c3911..a7b5658c0460 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ #include #include #include -#include +#include #include #include #include @@ -265,8 +265,4 @@ fail_put_node: return ret; } -module_init(ti_cpufreq_init); - -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI CPUFreq/OPP hw-supported driver"); -MODULE_AUTHOR("Dave Gerlach "); -MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); +device_initcall(ti_cpufreq_init);