From: Edward Cree Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 16:02:49 +0000 (+0100) Subject: sfc: don't insert mc_list on low-latency firmware if it's too long X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=148cbab6cffc8247d7dfd0f2da86c2eb8c55709c;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git sfc: don't insert mc_list on low-latency firmware if it's too long If the mc_list is longer than 256 addresses, we enter mc_promisc mode. If we're in mc_promisc mode and the firmware doesn't support cascaded multicast, normally we also insert our mc_list, to prevent stealing by another VI. However, if the mc_list was too long, this isn't really helpful - the MC groups that didn't fit in the list can still get stolen, and having only some of them stealable will probably cause more confusing behaviour than having them all stealable. Since inserting 256 multicast filters takes a long time and can lead to MCDI state machine timeouts, just skip the mc_list insert in this overflow condition. Signed-off-by: Edward Cree Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c index c60c2d4c646a..78efb2822b86 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct efx_ef10_filter_table { bool mc_promisc; /* Whether in multicast promiscuous mode when last changed */ bool mc_promisc_last; + bool mc_overflow; /* Too many MC addrs; should always imply mc_promisc */ bool vlan_filter; struct list_head vlan_list; }; @@ -5058,6 +5059,7 @@ static void efx_ef10_filter_mc_addr_list(struct efx_nic *efx) struct netdev_hw_addr *mc; unsigned int i, addr_count; + table->mc_overflow = false; table->mc_promisc = !!(net_dev->flags & (IFF_PROMISC | IFF_ALLMULTI)); addr_count = netdev_mc_count(net_dev); @@ -5065,6 +5067,7 @@ static void efx_ef10_filter_mc_addr_list(struct efx_nic *efx) netdev_for_each_mc_addr(mc, net_dev) { if (i >= EFX_EF10_FILTER_DEV_MC_MAX) { table->mc_promisc = true; + table->mc_overflow = true; break; } ether_addr_copy(table->dev_mc_list[i].addr, mc->addr); @@ -5469,12 +5472,15 @@ static void efx_ef10_filter_vlan_sync_rx_mode(struct efx_nic *efx, } } else { /* If we failed to insert promiscuous filters, don't - * rollback. Regardless, also insert the mc_list + * rollback. Regardless, also insert the mc_list, + * unless it's incomplete due to overflow */ efx_ef10_filter_insert_def(efx, vlan, EFX_ENCAP_TYPE_NONE, true, false); - efx_ef10_filter_insert_addr_list(efx, vlan, true, false); + if (!table->mc_overflow) + efx_ef10_filter_insert_addr_list(efx, vlan, + true, false); } } else { /* If any filters failed to insert, rollback and fall back to