From: Chris Wilson Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 07:08:24 +0000 (+0100) Subject: drm/amdgpu: Remove call to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu before wait X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0fea2ed61e7fc5f31520cf2476f33bdf2d6756ab;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git drm/amdgpu: Remove call to reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu before wait Since fence_wait_timeout_reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() with a timeout of 0 becomes reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(), we do not need to handle such conversion in the caller. The only challenge are those callers that wish to differentiate the error code between the nonblocking busy check and potentially blocking wait. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Alex Deucher Cc: Christian König Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160829070834.22296-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c index a7ea9a3b454e..e0171c75b60c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c @@ -407,10 +407,8 @@ int amdgpu_gem_wait_idle_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, return -ENOENT; } robj = gem_to_amdgpu_bo(gobj); - if (timeout == 0) - ret = reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(robj->tbo.resv, true); - else - ret = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(robj->tbo.resv, true, true, timeout); + ret = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(robj->tbo.resv, true, true, + timeout); /* ret == 0 means not signaled, * ret > 0 means signaled