From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 06:12:28 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: powerpc: Use ARCH_IRQ_INIT_FLAGS
X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=089fb442f3018a3ed094f8ac7a7cc2d3bd03b114;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git

powerpc: Use ARCH_IRQ_INIT_FLAGS

Define the ARCH_IRQ_INIT_FLAGS instead of fixing it up in a loop.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
index ff08b70b36d4..bb712c9488b3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
@@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled(void)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
 
+#define ARCH_IRQ_INIT_FLAGS	IRQ_NOREQUEST
+
 /*
  * interrupt-retrigger: should we handle this via lost interrupts and IPIs
  * or should we not care like we do now ? --BenH.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
index ce557f6f00fc..0531ccda8005 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
@@ -1074,21 +1074,6 @@ void irq_free_virt(unsigned int virq, unsigned int count)
 
 int arch_early_irq_init(void)
 {
-	struct irq_desc *desc;
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < NR_IRQS; i++) {
-		desc = irq_to_desc(i);
-		if (desc)
-			desc->status |= IRQ_NOREQUEST;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-int arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int node)
-{
-	desc->status |= IRQ_NOREQUEST;
 	return 0;
 }