From: Andrey Smirnov Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:53:21 +0000 (-0800) Subject: pinctrl-sx150x: Use handle_bad_irq instead of handle_edge_irq X-Git-Url: https://git.stricted.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=080c489dde6355dedd7dc5a93821199d0bbf9279;p=GitHub%2Fmoto-9609%2Fandroid_kernel_motorola_exynos9610.git pinctrl-sx150x: Use handle_bad_irq instead of handle_edge_irq Althought the function passed as a "handler" during GPIO chip instantiation is not going to ever be called, specifying handle_edge_irq there makes for a rather confusing read, both because no "ack" callback in specified for irqchip and because there's no acking action is necessary. Specify handle_bad_irq instead a make a note of the situation. This commit should be a no-op behaviour wise. Tested-by: Neil Armstrong Acked-by: Neil Armstrong Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c index 78e15c9a73a2..798a8bb143c1 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c @@ -1077,9 +1077,20 @@ static int sx150x_probe(struct i2c_client *client, pctl->irq.masked = ~0; pctl->irq.sense = 0; + /* + * Because sx150x_irq_threaded_fn invokes all of the + * nested interrrupt handlers via handle_nested_irq, + * any "handler" passed to gpiochip_irqchip_add() + * below is going to be ignored, so the choice of the + * function does not matter that much. + * + * We set it to handle_bad_irq to avoid confusion, + * plus it will be instantly noticeable if it is ever + * called (should not happen) + */ ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add(&pctl->gpio, &pctl->irq_chip, 0, - handle_edge_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE); + handle_bad_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "could not connect irqchip to gpiochip\n"); return ret;