msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(address);
msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(address);
- msg->data = hwirq;
+ /*
+ * MPIC version 2.0 has erratum PIC1. It causes
+ * that neither MSI nor MSI-X can work fine.
+ * This is a workaround to allow MSI-X to function
+ * properly. It only works for MSI-X, we prevent
+ * MSI on buggy chips in fsl_setup_msi_irqs().
+ */
+ if (msi_data->feature & MSI_HW_ERRATA_ENDIAN)
+ msg->data = __swab32(hwirq);
+ else
+ msg->data = hwirq;
pr_debug("%s: allocated srs: %d, ibs: %d\n", __func__,
(hwirq >> msi_data->srs_shift) & MSI_SRS_MASK,
struct msi_msg msg;
struct fsl_msi *msi_data;
- if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX)
- pr_debug("fslmsi: MSI-X untested, trying anyway.\n");
+ if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI) {
+ /*
+ * MPIC version 2.0 has erratum PIC1. For now MSI
+ * could not work. So check to prevent MSI from
+ * being used on the board with this erratum.
+ */
+ list_for_each_entry(msi_data, &msi_head, list)
+ if (msi_data->feature & MSI_HW_ERRATA_ENDIAN)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
/*
* If the PCI node has an fsl,msi property, then we need to use it
msi->feature = features->fsl_pic_ip;
+ /* For erratum PIC1 on MPIC version 2.0*/
+ if ((features->fsl_pic_ip & FSL_PIC_IP_MASK) == FSL_PIC_IP_MPIC
+ && (fsl_mpic_primary_get_version() == 0x0200))
+ msi->feature |= MSI_HW_ERRATA_ENDIAN;
+
/*
* Remember the phandle, so that we can match with any PCI nodes
* that have an "fsl,msi" property.