commit
07892b10356f17717abdc578acbef72db86c880e upstream.
The correct values referred by a boolean control are
value.integer.value[], not value.enumerated.item[].
The former is long while the latter is int, so it's even incompatible
on 64bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct wm8955_priv *wm8955 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
- ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] = wm8955->deemph;
+ ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = wm8955->deemph;
return 0;
}
{
struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
struct wm8955_priv *wm8955 = snd_soc_codec_get_drvdata(codec);
- int deemph = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
+ int deemph = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
if (deemph > 1)
return -EINVAL;