"incvalue" variable holds a result of "er32(TIMINCA) &
E1000_TIMINCA_INCVALUE_MASK" and used in "do_div(temp, incvalue)"
as a divisor.
Thus, "u64 incvalue" declaration is probably a mistake.
Even though it seems to be a harmless one, let's fix it.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
}
if ((hw->mac.type == e1000_82574) || (hw->mac.type == e1000_82583)) {
- u64 incvalue, time_delta, rem, temp;
+ u64 time_delta, rem, temp;
+ u32 incvalue;
int i;
/* errata for 82574/82583 possible bad bits read from SYSTIMH/L