sched: Fix fork vs hotplug vs cpuset namespaces

There are a number of issues:

1) TASK_WAKING vs cgroup_clone (cpusets)

copy_process():

  sched_fork()
    child->state = TASK_WAKING; /* waiting for wake_up_new_task() */
  if (current->nsproxy != p->nsproxy)
     ns_cgroup_clone()
       cgroup_clone()
         mutex_lock(inode->i_mutex)
         mutex_lock(cgroup_mutex)
         cgroup_attach_task()
	   ss->can_attach()
           ss->attach() [ -> cpuset_attach() ]
             cpuset_attach_task()
               set_cpus_allowed_ptr();
                 while (child->state == TASK_WAKING)
                   cpu_relax();
will deadlock the system.

2) cgroup_clone (cpusets) vs copy_process

So even if the above would work we still have:

copy_process():

  if (current->nsproxy != p->nsproxy)
     ns_cgroup_clone()
       cgroup_clone()
         mutex_lock(inode->i_mutex)
         mutex_lock(cgroup_mutex)
         cgroup_attach_task()
	   ss->can_attach()
           ss->attach() [ -> cpuset_attach() ]
             cpuset_attach_task()
               set_cpus_allowed_ptr();
  ...

  p->cpus_allowed = current->cpus_allowed

over-writing the modified cpus_allowed.

3) fork() vs hotplug

  if we unplug the child's cpu after the sanity check when the child
  gets attached to the task_list but before wake_up_new_task() shit
  will meet with fan.

Solve all these issues by moving fork cpu selection into
wake_up_new_task().

Reported-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1264106190.4283.1314.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 5b2959b3ffc2c239244c25548f3d5c5506baf674..f88bd984df35fc937a7ee0c2ab89ac091ce5141d 100644 (file)
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1241,21 +1241,6 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
        /* Need tasklist lock for parent etc handling! */
        write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 
-       /*
-        * The task hasn't been attached yet, so its cpus_allowed mask will
-        * not be changed, nor will its assigned CPU.
-        *
-        * The cpus_allowed mask of the parent may have changed after it was
-        * copied first time - so re-copy it here, then check the child's CPU
-        * to ensure it is on a valid CPU (and if not, just force it back to
-        * parent's CPU). This avoids alot of nasty races.
-        */
-       p->cpus_allowed = current->cpus_allowed;
-       p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed = current->rt.nr_cpus_allowed;
-       if (unlikely(!cpu_isset(task_cpu(p), p->cpus_allowed) ||
-                       !cpu_online(task_cpu(p))))
-               set_task_cpu(p, smp_processor_id());
-
        /* CLONE_PARENT re-uses the old parent */
        if (clone_flags & (CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_THREAD)) {
                p->real_parent = current->real_parent;

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 4508fe7048be5d91ee5a01daef3fe9de8d37b909..3a8fb30a91b1bba639e164d8f34209a0497ae9fd 100644 (file)
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2320,14 +2320,12 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
 }
 
 /*
- * Called from:
+ * Gets called from 3 sites (exec, fork, wakeup), since it is called without
+ * holding rq->lock we need to ensure ->cpus_allowed is stable, this is done
+ * by:
  *
- *  - fork, @p is stable because it isn't on the tasklist yet
- *
- *  - exec, @p is unstable, retry loop
- *
- *  - wake-up, we serialize ->cpus_allowed against TASK_WAKING so
- *             we should be good.
+ *  exec:           is unstable, retry loop
+ *  fork & wake-up: serialize ->cpus_allowed against TASK_WAKING
  */
 static inline
 int select_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flags, int wake_flags)
@@ -2620,9 +2618,6 @@ void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p, int clone_flags)
        if (p->sched_class->task_fork)
                p->sched_class->task_fork(p);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-       cpu = select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_FORK, 0);
-#endif
        set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
@@ -2652,6 +2647,21 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags)
 {
        unsigned long flags;
        struct rq *rq;
+       int cpu = get_cpu();
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+       /*
+        * Fork balancing, do it here and not earlier because:
+        *  - cpus_allowed can change in the fork path
+        *  - any previously selected cpu might disappear through hotplug
+        *
+        * We still have TASK_WAKING but PF_STARTING is gone now, meaning
+        * ->cpus_allowed is stable, we have preemption disabled, meaning
+        * cpu_online_mask is stable.
+        */
+       cpu = select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_FORK, 0);
+       set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
+#endif
 
        rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
        BUG_ON(p->state != TASK_WAKING);
@@ -2665,6 +2675,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags)
                p->sched_class->task_woken(rq, p);
 #endif
        task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
+       put_cpu();
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
@@ -7139,14 +7150,18 @@ int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask)
         * the ->cpus_allowed mask from under waking tasks, which would be
         * possible when we change rq->lock in ttwu(), so synchronize against
         * TASK_WAKING to avoid that.
+        *
+        * Make an exception for freshly cloned tasks, since cpuset namespaces
+        * might move the task about, we have to validate the target in
+        * wake_up_new_task() anyway since the cpu might have gone away.
         */
 again:
-       while (p->state == TASK_WAKING)
+       while (p->state == TASK_WAKING && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING))
                cpu_relax();
 
        rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
 
-       if (p->state == TASK_WAKING) {
+       if (p->state == TASK_WAKING && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING)) {
                task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
                goto again;
        }