An extent with lblock =
4294967295 and len = 1 will pass the
ext4_valid_extent() test:
ext4_lblk_t last = lblock + len - 1;
if (len == 0 || lblock > last)
return 0;
since last =
4294967295 + 1 - 1 =
4294967295. This would later trigger
the BUG_ON(es->es_lblk + es->es_len < es->es_lblk) in ext4_es_end().
We can simplify it by removing the - 1 altogether and changing the test
to use lblock + len <= lblock, since now if len = 0, then lblock + 0 ==
lblock and it fails, and if len > 0 then lblock + len > lblock in order
to pass (i.e. it doesn't overflow).
Fixes:
5946d0893 ("ext4: check for overlapping extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries()")
Fixes:
2f974865f ("ext4: check for zero length extent explicitly")
Cc: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Phil Turnbull <phil.turnbull@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_fsblk_t block = ext4_ext_pblock(ext);
int len = ext4_ext_get_actual_len(ext);
ext4_lblk_t lblock = le32_to_cpu(ext->ee_block);
- ext4_lblk_t last = lblock + len - 1;
- if (len == 0 || lblock > last)
+ /*
+ * We allow neither:
+ * - zero length
+ * - overflow/wrap-around
+ */
+ if (lblock + len <= lblock)
return 0;
return ext4_data_block_valid(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb), block, len);
}