Benchmark shows small performance improvement on fusion io device.
Before:
seq-read : io=1,024MB, bw=19,982KB/s, iops=39,964, runt= 52475msec
seq-write: io=1,024MB, bw=20,321KB/s, iops=40,641, runt= 51601msec
rnd-read : io=1,024MB, bw=15,404KB/s, iops=30,808, runt= 68070msec
rnd-write: io=1,024MB, bw=14,776KB/s, iops=29,552, runt= 70963msec
After:
seq-read : io=1,024MB, bw=20,343KB/s, iops=40,685, runt= 51546msec
seq-write: io=1,024MB, bw=20,803KB/s, iops=41,606, runt= 50404msec
rnd-read : io=1,024MB, bw=16,221KB/s, iops=32,442, runt= 64642msec
rnd-write: io=1,024MB, bw=15,199KB/s, iops=30,397, runt= 68991msec
Signed-off-by: Asias He <asias@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
/* The disk structure for the kernel. */
struct gendisk *disk;
- /* Request tracking. */
- struct list_head reqs;
-
mempool_t *pool;
/* Process context for config space updates */
struct virtblk_req
{
- struct list_head list;
struct request *req;
struct virtio_blk_outhdr out_hdr;
struct virtio_scsi_inhdr in_hdr;
}
__blk_end_request_all(vbr->req, error);
- list_del(&vbr->list);
mempool_free(vbr, vblk->pool);
}
/* In case queue is stopped waiting for more buffers. */
return false;
}
- list_add_tail(&vbr->list, &vblk->reqs);
return true;
}
goto out_free_index;
}
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vblk->reqs);
spin_lock_init(&vblk->lock);
vblk->vdev = vdev;
vblk->sg_elems = sg_elems;
vblk->config_enable = false;
mutex_unlock(&vblk->config_lock);
- /* Nothing should be pending. */
- BUG_ON(!list_empty(&vblk->reqs));
-
/* Stop all the virtqueues. */
vdev->config->reset(vdev);