This causes ipic_set_irq_type to set the handler directly rather
than call set_irq_handler, which causes spinlock recursion because
the lock is already held when ipic_set_irq_type is called.
I'm also not convinced that ipic_set_irq_type should be changing the
handler at all. There seem to be several controllers that don't and
several that do. Those that do would break what appears to be a common
usage of calling set_irq_chip_and_handler followed by set_irq_type, if a
non-standard handler were to be used. OTOH, irq_create_of_mapping()
doesn't set the handler, but only calls set_irq_type().
This patch gets things working in the spinlock-debugging-enabled case,
but I'm curious as to where the handler setting is ideally supposed to be
done. I don't see any documentation on set_irq_type() that clarifies
what the semantics are supposed to be.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
desc->status |= flow_type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
if (flow_type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW) {
desc->status |= IRQ_LEVEL;
- set_irq_handler(virq, handle_level_irq);
+ desc->handle_irq = handle_level_irq;
} else {
- set_irq_handler(virq, handle_edge_irq);
+ desc->handle_irq = handle_edge_irq;
}
/* only EXT IRQ senses are programmable on ipic