PTRS_PER_PUD should be based on PUD_INDEX_SIZE, not PMD_INDEX_SIZE. We
got away with it because PUD and PMD had the same index size, but this is
no longer true with Aneesh's patchset to support a 46-bit user effective
address space.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
#define PTRS_PER_PTE (1 << PTE_INDEX_SIZE)
#define PTRS_PER_PMD (1 << PMD_INDEX_SIZE)
-#define PTRS_PER_PUD (1 << PMD_INDEX_SIZE)
+#define PTRS_PER_PUD (1 << PUD_INDEX_SIZE)
#define PTRS_PER_PGD (1 << PGD_INDEX_SIZE)
/* PMD_SHIFT determines what a second-level page table entry can map */