The commit
a9ab775bcadf ("workqueue: directly restore CPU affinity of
workers from CPU_ONLINE") moved the pool->lock into rebind_workers()
without also moving "pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED".
There is nothing wrong with "pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED" not
being moved together, but there isn't any benefit either. We move it
into rebind_workers() and achieve these benefits:
1) Better readability. POOL_DISASSOCIATED is cleared in
rebind_workers() as expected.
2) When POOL_DISASSOCIATED is cleared, we can ensure that all the
running workers of the pool are on the local CPU (pool->cpu).
tj: Cosmetic updates to the code and description.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
+ pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) {
unsigned int worker_flags = worker->flags;
for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
- if (pool->cpu == cpu) {
- spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
- pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
- spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
-
+ if (pool->cpu == cpu)
rebind_workers(pool);
- } else if (pool->cpu < 0) {
+ else if (pool->cpu < 0)
restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(pool, cpu);
- }
mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex);
}