It seems unlikely, but access to self_id_cpu[0] could at least in theory
be deferred until after the loop over self_id_cpu[1..n] or even after
the subsequent reg_read. Enforce the desired order by a read barrier.
Also prevent the reg_read from being reordered relative to the for loop.
This isn't necessary if the loop's conditional printk counts as an
implicit barrier, but better make it explicit.
(self_id_cpu[] is a coherent DMA buffer.)
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/semaphore.h>
+#include <asm/system.h>
#include "fw-transaction.h"
#include "fw-ohci.h"
self_id_count = (reg_read(ohci, OHCI1394_SelfIDCount) >> 3) & 0x3ff;
generation = (le32_to_cpu(ohci->self_id_cpu[0]) >> 16) & 0xff;
+ rmb();
for (i = 1, j = 0; j < self_id_count; i += 2, j++) {
if (ohci->self_id_cpu[i] != ~ohci->self_id_cpu[i + 1])
fw_error("inconsistent self IDs\n");
ohci->self_id_buffer[j] = le32_to_cpu(ohci->self_id_cpu[i]);
}
+ rmb();
/*
* Check the consistency of the self IDs we just read. The