locking/Documentation: Clarify failed cmpxchg() memory ordering semantics
authorWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:10:06 +0000 (16:10 +0100)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Mon, 3 Aug 2015 08:57:09 +0000 (10:57 +0200)
A failed cmpxchg does not provide any memory ordering guarantees, a
property that is used to optimise the cmpxchg implementations on Alpha,
PowerPC and arm64.

This patch updates atomic_ops.txt and memory-barriers.txt to reflect
this.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hp.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150716151006.GH26390@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Documentation/atomic_ops.txt
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt

index dab6da3382d9f0b5f3c1e9f6e3fafc0cc2535de2..b19fc34efdb17921af43bda0000b13dc82640451 100644 (file)
@@ -266,7 +266,9 @@ with the given old and new values. Like all atomic_xxx operations,
 atomic_cmpxchg will only satisfy its atomicity semantics as long as all
 other accesses of *v are performed through atomic_xxx operations.
 
-atomic_cmpxchg must provide explicit memory barriers around the operation.
+atomic_cmpxchg must provide explicit memory barriers around the operation,
+although if the comparison fails then no memory ordering guarantees are
+required.
 
 The semantics for atomic_cmpxchg are the same as those defined for 'cas'
 below.
index 13feb697271f0a270334dd3807255ed14af7d7ed..18fc860df1beeafe93abfb50060957144697a6b4 100644 (file)
@@ -2383,9 +2383,7 @@ about the state (old or new) implies an SMP-conditional general memory barrier
 explicit lock operations, described later).  These include:
 
        xchg();
-       cmpxchg();
        atomic_xchg();                  atomic_long_xchg();
-       atomic_cmpxchg();               atomic_long_cmpxchg();
        atomic_inc_return();            atomic_long_inc_return();
        atomic_dec_return();            atomic_long_dec_return();
        atomic_add_return();            atomic_long_add_return();
@@ -2398,7 +2396,9 @@ explicit lock operations, described later).  These include:
        test_and_clear_bit();
        test_and_change_bit();
 
-       /* when succeeds (returns 1) */
+       /* when succeeds */
+       cmpxchg();
+       atomic_cmpxchg();               atomic_long_cmpxchg();
        atomic_add_unless();            atomic_long_add_unless();
 
 These are used for such things as implementing ACQUIRE-class and RELEASE-class