mremap: check for overflow using deltas
authorAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Tue, 1 Nov 2011 00:08:22 +0000 (17:08 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Tue, 1 Nov 2011 00:30:47 +0000 (17:30 -0700)
Using "- 1" relies on the old_end to be page aligned and PAGE_SIZE > 1,
those are reasonable requirements but the check remains obscure and it
looks more like an off by one error than an overflow check.  This I feel
will improve readability.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
mm/mremap.c

index 506fa44403df5cc3215cb69ec2d1098a96bb7919..195e866568e04d312224f4a674e0873c46e3d2eb 100644 (file)
@@ -141,9 +141,10 @@ unsigned long move_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
        for (; old_addr < old_end; old_addr += extent, new_addr += extent) {
                cond_resched();
                next = (old_addr + PMD_SIZE) & PMD_MASK;
-               if (next - 1 > old_end)
-                       next = old_end;
+               /* even if next overflowed, extent below will be ok */
                extent = next - old_addr;
+               if (extent > old_end - old_addr)
+                       extent = old_end - old_addr;
                old_pmd = get_old_pmd(vma->vm_mm, old_addr);
                if (!old_pmd)
                        continue;