tty: Prefix tty_ldisc_{lock,lock_nested,unlock} functions

tty_ldisc_lock(), tty_ldisc_unlock(), and tty_ldisc_lock_nested()
are low-level aliases for the underlying lock mechanism. Rename
with double underscore to allow for new, higher level functions
with those names.

Reviewed-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index 1c4d7b6d8a76f06d7615222b7a353f7c077e8836..5bdc241628ac5970c44291f068de70c678137275 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -308,19 +308,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tty_ldisc_deref);
 
 
 static inline int __lockfunc
-tty_ldisc_lock(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned long timeout)
+__tty_ldisc_lock(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned long timeout)
 {
        return ldsem_down_write(&tty->ldisc_sem, timeout);
 }
 
 static inline int __lockfunc
-tty_ldisc_lock_nested(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned long timeout)
+__tty_ldisc_lock_nested(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned long timeout)
 {
        return ldsem_down_write_nested(&tty->ldisc_sem,
                                       LDISC_SEM_OTHER, timeout);
 }
 
-static inline void tty_ldisc_unlock(struct tty_struct *tty)
+static inline void __tty_ldisc_unlock(struct tty_struct *tty)
 {
        return ldsem_up_write(&tty->ldisc_sem);
 }
@@ -332,24 +332,24 @@ tty_ldisc_lock_pair_timeout(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_struct *tty2,
        int ret;
 
        if (tty < tty2) {
-               ret = tty_ldisc_lock(tty, timeout);
+               ret = __tty_ldisc_lock(tty, timeout);
                if (ret) {
-                       ret = tty_ldisc_lock_nested(tty2, timeout);
+                       ret = __tty_ldisc_lock_nested(tty2, timeout);
                        if (!ret)
-                               tty_ldisc_unlock(tty);
+                               __tty_ldisc_unlock(tty);
                }
        } else {
                /* if this is possible, it has lots of implications */
                WARN_ON_ONCE(tty == tty2);
                if (tty2 && tty != tty2) {
-                       ret = tty_ldisc_lock(tty2, timeout);
+                       ret = __tty_ldisc_lock(tty2, timeout);
                        if (ret) {
-                               ret = tty_ldisc_lock_nested(tty, timeout);
+                               ret = __tty_ldisc_lock_nested(tty, timeout);
                                if (!ret)
-                                       tty_ldisc_unlock(tty2);
+                                       __tty_ldisc_unlock(tty2);
                        }
                } else
-                       ret = tty_ldisc_lock(tty, timeout);
+                       ret = __tty_ldisc_lock(tty, timeout);
        }
 
        if (!ret)
@@ -370,9 +370,9 @@ tty_ldisc_lock_pair(struct tty_struct *tty, struct tty_struct *tty2)
 static void __lockfunc tty_ldisc_unlock_pair(struct tty_struct *tty,
                                             struct tty_struct *tty2)
 {
-       tty_ldisc_unlock(tty);
+       __tty_ldisc_unlock(tty);
        if (tty2)
-               tty_ldisc_unlock(tty2);
+               __tty_ldisc_unlock(tty2);
 }
 
 static void __lockfunc tty_ldisc_enable_pair(struct tty_struct *tty,