genirq: try_one_irq() must be called with irq disabled

Prarit reported:
=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
2.6.32-rc5 #1
---------------------------------
inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
swapper/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
 (&irq_desc_lock_class){?.-...}, at: [<ffffffff810c264e>] try_one_irq+0x32/0x138
{IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
 [<ffffffff81095160>] __lock_acquire+0x2fc/0xd5d
 [<ffffffff81095cb4>] lock_acquire+0xf3/0x12d
 [<ffffffff814cdadd>] _spin_lock+0x40/0x89
 [<ffffffff810c3389>] handle_level_irq+0x30/0x105
 [<ffffffff81014e0e>] handle_irq+0x95/0xb7
 [<ffffffff810141bd>] do_IRQ+0x6a/0xe0
 [<ffffffff81012813>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x16
irq event stamp: 195096
hardirqs last  enabled at (195096): [<ffffffff814cd7f7>] _spin_unlock_irq+0x3a/0x5c
hardirqs last disabled at (195095): [<ffffffff814cdbdd>] _spin_lock_irq+0x29/0x95
softirqs last  enabled at (195088): [<ffffffff81068c92>] __do_softirq+0x1c1/0x1ef
softirqs last disabled at (195093): [<ffffffff8101304c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30

other info that might help us debug this:
1 lock held by swapper/0:
 #0:  (kernel/irq/spurious.c:21){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff81070cf2>]
run_timer_softirq+0x1a9/0x315

stack backtrace:
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.32-rc5 #1
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>  [<ffffffff81093e94>] valid_state+0x187/0x1ae
 [<ffffffff81093fe4>] mark_lock+0x129/0x253
 [<ffffffff810951d4>] __lock_acquire+0x370/0xd5d
 [<ffffffff81095cb4>] lock_acquire+0xf3/0x12d
 [<ffffffff814cdadd>] _spin_lock+0x40/0x89
 [<ffffffff810c264e>] try_one_irq+0x32/0x138
 [<ffffffff810c2795>] poll_all_shared_irqs+0x41/0x6d
 [<ffffffff810c27dd>] poll_spurious_irqs+0x1c/0x49
 [<ffffffff81070d82>] run_timer_softirq+0x239/0x315
 [<ffffffff81068bd3>] __do_softirq+0x102/0x1ef
 [<ffffffff8101304c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
 [<ffffffff81014b65>] do_softirq+0x59/0xca
 [<ffffffff810686ad>] irq_exit+0x58/0xae
 [<ffffffff81029b84>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x94/0xba
 [<ffffffff81012a33>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x13/0x20

The reason is that try_one_irq() is called from hardirq context with
interrupts disabled and from softirq context (poll_all_shared_irqs())
with interrupts enabled.

Disable interrupts before calling it from poll_all_shared_irqs().

Reported-and-tested-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <1257563773-4620-1-git-send-email-yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
index 114e704760fe9a3db21d2c06aabd5ee868c0dc8d..bd7273e6282ecf65a015c1e02239959497753a06 100644 (file)
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -121,7 +121,9 @@ static void poll_all_shared_irqs(void)
                if (!(status & IRQ_SPURIOUS_DISABLED))
                        continue;
 
+               local_irq_disable();
                try_one_irq(i, desc);
+               local_irq_enable();
        }
 }